...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of energy & natural resources law >Is the Rule of Capture Countenanced in the South China Sea? The Policy and Practice of China, the Philippines and Vietnam
【24h】

Is the Rule of Capture Countenanced in the South China Sea? The Policy and Practice of China, the Philippines and Vietnam

机译:南中国海是否有捕获规则?中国,菲律宾和越南的政策与实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article examines the petroleum regimes of China, the Philippines and Vietnam to ascertain whether they countenance the rule of capture in the South China Sea. It concludes that the policy and practice of Vietnam clearly and absolutely do not countenance the application of the rule of capture in regard to potential or actual transboundary petroleum deposits in the South China Sea. On the other hand, China has maintained a 1996 secrecy regulation, which authorises China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) to undertake unilateral activities involving transboundary deposits in disputed areas of the South China Sea. At the same time, China has adopted bilateral declarations and agreements that preclude the application of the rule of capture in both delimited and undelimited areas of the South China Sea. As for Philippine policy and practice, there is ambivalence towards the potential or actual presence of transboundary deposits.
机译:本文研究了中国,菲律宾和越南的石油政权,以确定它们是否支持南中国海的捕获规则。结论是,越南的政策和做法显然绝对不赞成在南中国海潜在或实际的跨界石油矿床中采用捕捞规则。另一方面,中国维持了1996年的保密法规,授权中国海洋石油总公司(CNOOC)在南海有争议地区进行涉及跨境沉积的单方面活动。同时,中国通过了双边声明和协议,排除了在南中国海的划界和划界区域适用捕捞规则的情况。至于菲律宾的政策和做法,人们对跨界沉积物的潜在或实际存在矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号