首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Educational Administration >Constructing theory for leadership in intercultural contexts
【24h】

Constructing theory for leadership in intercultural contexts

机译:建构跨文化背景下的领导力理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – Established educational leadership discourse has been dominated by Anglo-American perspectives oblivious to the cultural diversity that characterizes the contemporary world. It has frequently privileged mono-cultural, mainstream values which have meant indigenous and ethnic groups have suffered alienation, exclusion and disadvantage. Western-led educational interventions in developing nations also frequently fail to acknowledge the rich cultural traditions of recipient societies and theories and practice are rarely appropriately scrutinized for “cultural fit”. The purpose of this paper is to construct a theory for leadership in intercultural contexts. Design/methodology/approach – The article reviews how monocultural assumptions of colonial and national leadership cultures in the past were frequently inappropriate for the diverse populations they were intended to serve. The global era has witnessed the emergence of cross-cultural theory and research paradigms to combat cultural blindness and develop cultural sensitivities. While applauding these developments, the epistemological assumptions that underlie such research are questioned. A case for more nuanced theory, which acknowledges complex interactions between agents from different cultures, is developed. This includes a call for more dynamic research tools based upon constructivist and phenomenological premises. Findings – Cross-cultural research has generated territorial maps that promote insight and mutual understandings. However, it relies upon essentialist stereotypes that mask the existence of complex sub-cultures and dynamic forces of change within national cultures. Case study research which taps the subjective understandings of cultural actors is cited to reveal a more complex process of interaction between cultural agents. Research limitations/implications – This is a theoretical exploration, not an empirical report. It is limited by the scarcity of existing research in a fledgling field. Practical implications – The article encourages researchers to move from observationally based, stereotypical portraits to more nuanced concepts of cultures as complex, multi-layered and changing phenomena. It establishes the epistemological foundations for future research in inter-cultural contexts. Originality/value – The paper develops new directions for future theory and research.
机译:目的–既定的教育领导力话语已被英裔美国人的观点所支配,而忽略了代表当今世界的文化多样性。它经常享有特权的单一文化主流价值观,这意味着土著和民族遭受了疏离,排斥和不利。西方国家在发展中国家实施的教育干预措施也常常不能承认接受者社会的丰富文化传统,因此很少对“文化适应性”进行适当的理论和实践审查。本文的目的是为跨文化背景下的领导力构建理论。设计/方法论/方法-本文回顾了过去殖民地和国家领导文化的单文化假设如何经常不适用于他们打算服务的不同人群。全球时代已经见证了跨文化理论和研究范式的出现,以消除文化盲目并发展文化敏感性。在赞扬这些发展的同时,质疑了作为这种研究基础的认识论假设。提出了一个更细致的理论,该案例承认来自不同文化的主体之间的复杂相互作用。这包括呼吁基于建构主义和现象学前提的更具动态性的研究工具。调查结果–跨文化研究产生了可以增进见识和相互理解的领土图。但是,它依赖于本质主义刻板印象,这种刻板印象掩盖了复杂亚文化的存在和民族文化内变化的动态力量。引用了对文化参与者的主观理解的案例研究,以揭示文化主体之间相互作用的更复杂过程。研究的局限性/意义–这是理论探索,不是经验报告。它受到新兴领域现有研究的匮乏的限制。实际意义–文章鼓励研究人员从基于观察的刻板印象肖像转向更为细微的文化概念,即复杂,多层和变化的现象。它为跨文化背景下的未来研究奠定了认识论基础。原创性/价值-本文为未来的理论和研究发展提出了新的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号