首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education Policy >Democratising the curriculum or training the children of the poor: school-based vocational training in Australia
【24h】

Democratising the curriculum or training the children of the poor: school-based vocational training in Australia

机译:使课程民主化或对穷人的孩子进行培训:澳大利亚基于学校的职业培训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Historically grounded in a tradition of meeting local skills needs and training the children of the poor, vocational education and training (VET) in schools continues to struggle in terms of esteem and parity of status. Associated in the literature with the training of a reliable and compliant class of workers, it has also been tainted by its links to the processes of social selection and its lowly status in the hierarchy of school subjects. However, VET has also been proposed as a means of democratising the school curriculum and improving accessibility for marginalised populations. The evidence presented in this article suggests that VET provision in Australian schools is of relatively poor quality and furthermore is associated with significant levels of social selection - rather than democratisation. The Australian policy framework, strait-jacketed by the belief that it must avoid narrow instrumentalism, has allowed and assisted the evolution of a low quality, low-intensity VET regime which serves a mainly working-class clientele in mainly working-class schools. In reviewing the current Australian evidence, it argues that if the central debate is one between the competing demands of achieving equity (which is associated with comprehensive provision) and that of achieving quality VET (which is associated with tracked provision) then, sadly, Australia fails to deliver effectively on either of these aims.
机译:从历史上讲,满足当地技能需求和培训贫困儿童的传统,在学校的职业教育和培训(VET)继续在尊重和地位平等方面挣扎。在文献中,它与对可靠且合规的工人阶级的培训相关联,也因其与社会选择过程的联系及其在学校科目等级中的地位低下而受到污染。但是,还提出了职业教育与培训,作为使学校课程民主化和改善边缘化人群可及性的一种手段。本文提供的证据表明,澳大利亚学校提供的职业教育与培训质量相对较差,而且还与社会选择水平高而不是民主化有关。认为必须避免狭narrow工具主义的信念使澳大利亚政策框架陷入困境,这种政策框架已经允许并协助了低质量,低强度的职业教育与培训制度的发展,该制度为主要是工人阶级学校中的主要工人阶级客户服务。在审查澳大利亚当前的证据时,它认为,如果中心辩论是在实现公平(与全面拨备有关)与实现高质量的VET(与跟踪拨备有关)的竞争需求之间进行的辩论,那么可悲的是,澳大利亚无法有效实现这些目标之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号