首页> 外文期刊>Journal of education for library and information science >Assessment in Fieldwork Courses: What Are We Rating?
【24h】

Assessment in Fieldwork Courses: What Are We Rating?

机译:实地考察课程中的评估:我们如何评价?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fieldwork exists as a component of many library schools' curricula. Site supervisors, students, and the schools themselves all play a role. A final part of most fieldwork experiences involves the use of an evaluation form filled out by a site supervisor about the student. In this study, forty seven evaluation forms were collected and analyzed through inductive content analysis in order to discern the attributes that are used to rate students. Attributes were compared to the ALA Core Competences of Librarianship and grouped into related subject-categories. Findings show that form content varied widely and few forms captured all tenets of the Core Competences. Recommendations include a new all-encompassing evaluation form that can be tailored to many different field-work experiences, and suggestions for future study on fieldwork.
机译:实地调查是许多图书馆学校课程的一部分。现场主管,学生和学校本身都扮演着角色。大多数现场工作经验的最后一部分涉及使用由现场监督员填写的关于学生的评估表。在这项研究中,收集了47份评估表,并通过归纳性内容分析法进行了分析,以便辨别用于对学生进行评分的属性。将属性与ALA图书馆管理核心能力进行比较,并归类为相关主题类别。调查结果表明,表格内容千差万别,很少有表格体现了核心能力的所有宗旨。建议包括可以针对许多不同的野外工作经验量身定制的新的,涵盖面广的评估表,以及对未来野外工作研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号