首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Surveys >CANTILLON AND HUME ON MONEY AND BANKING: THE FOUNDATIONS OF TWO THEORETICAL TRADITIONS
【24h】

CANTILLON AND HUME ON MONEY AND BANKING: THE FOUNDATIONS OF TWO THEORETICAL TRADITIONS

机译:坎蒂隆与休姆关于货币与银行的理论基础:两个理论传统的基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The distinction between the 'classical' monetary theory and 'quantity' theory has been proposed in literature on money and banking. The overall feature of the classical theory of money is that it holds one principle of regulation for each kind of issue (metallic money, bank issues and paper money) whereas the quantity theory applied the causality and proportionality postulates for all kinds of monies. Without claiming to adjudicate the validity of such a distinction, the paper investigates the foundation of each tradition. In this respect, this paper, respectively, examines, and provides a survey of the secondary literature on, Cantillon's Essai and the Hume's Discourses.
机译:关于货币和银行业的文献已经提出了“经典”货币理论和“数量”理论之间的区别。古典货币理论的总体特征是,它对每种发行(金属货币,银行发行和纸币)都具有一种监管原则,而数量论则对各种货币采用因果关系和比例假设。在不主张裁定这种区分的有效性的情况下,本文研究了每种传统的基础。在这方面,本文分别研究了有关坎蒂隆的《埃赛》和休Dis的《话语》的辅助文献并对其进行了综述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号