首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >Factor endowment, human capital, and inequality in developing countries
【24h】

Factor endowment, human capital, and inequality in developing countries

机译:发展中国家的要素end赋,人力资本和不平等

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to extend a theoretical model due to Ljungqvist and data from a sample of 19 developing economies to empirically test it. Design/methodology/approach - Data for all variables are from the 2005 Human Development Report and the 2006 World Development Report. The author applies the least-squares estimation technique in a multivariate linear regression. Findings - Based on data from the World Bank and the United Nations Development Programme, the paper uses a sample of 19 developing economies and finds that cross-country variations in income/consumption inequality may be explained by inequality of investment in human capital as measured by inequalities in child health as well as inequality in education and by inequality in the distribution of land as measured by the land Gini index. Practical implications - Assuming a population consisting of skilled laborers, unskilled laborers, educators/health care personnel, and farmers, the paper shows that starting from an initial distribution of assets and in the absence of a perfect capital market along with human capital exhibiting increasing returns it is possible to have persistent inequality in the distribution of income or consumption. Regression results also are consistent with the theoretical implication of the model as the extent of inequality in land distribution and in access to education as well as inequalities in child health do linearly influence income or consumption inequality as measured by the ratio of the share of income or consumption accounted for by the richest quintile to that of the poorest quintile. As a result, if governments in developing countries aim to reduce inequality, they need to implement programs designed to reduce inequalities in child health by allowing children from the poorest of the poor to get fully immunized, which in turn would lead to a reduction in infant and child mortality and in education by providing low-income families with means so that their children have better access to education. Government land policies, on the other hand, that succeed in reducing inequality in land distribution in developing countries, may be beneficial in terms of lessening income/expenditure inequality. Finally, while the present model does not test for the impact that improving capital markets would have, it stands to reason that improving capital markets could also have an impact on decreasing inequality. Originality/value - In this paper the author uses a model due to Ljungqvist to show that individuals are relatively wealthy because they either own a fixed input such as land or they are able to invest in human capital, which in turn allow them to earn sufficient rent or labor income to remain wealthy. On the other hand, poor people either do not own land or are not capable of investing in human capital, and, as a result, earn low incomes and remain poor. This joint causation of factor endowment or human capital investment and income helps explain income distribution. Using data from the United Nations Development Programme and the World Bank for a sample of 19 developing economies, it is found that cross-country variations in income/consumption inequality may be explained by inequality of investment in human capital as measured by inequalities in child health as well as well as inequality in education and by inequality in the distribution of land as measured by the land Gini index. These results will help governments in developing countries identify areas that need to be improved upon in order to reduce income/consumption inequality.
机译:目的-本文的目的是扩展基于Ljungqvist的理论模型和来自19个发展中经济体的样本数据,以进行实证检验。设计/方法/方法-所有变量的数据均来自《 2005年人类发展报告》和《 2006年世界发展报告》。作者在多元线性回归中应用了最小二乘估计技术。调查结果-根据世界银行和联合国开发计划署的数据,本文使用了19个发展中经济体的样本,发现收入/消费不平等的跨国差异可以用人力资本投资的不平等来解释。儿童健康不平等,教育不平等以及土地分配不平等(由土地基尼系数衡量)。实际意义-假设人口由技术工人,非技术工人,教育者/卫生保健人员和农民组成,本文表明,从资产的初始分配开始,在缺乏完善的资本市场的情况下,人力资本的回报率不断提高在收入或消费分配中可能会持续存在不平等现象。回归结果也与该模型的理论含义相吻合,因为土地分配和受教育程度的不平等程度以及儿童健康方面的不平等程度确实对收入或消费不平等产生线性影响(以收入或收入的比重衡量)最富有的五分之一人口占最贫穷的五分之一人口的消费量。结果,如果发展中国家的政府旨在减少不平等现象,则他们需要实施旨在减少儿童健康不平等现象的方案,使穷人中最贫穷的儿童获得充分的免疫接种,从而导致婴儿数量减少。通过为低收入家庭提供手段,使他们的孩子有更好的受教育机会,从而提高儿童死亡率和教育水平。另一方面,成功减少发展中国家土地分配不平等的政府土地政策,在减少收入/支出不平等方面可能是有益的。最后,虽然本模型并未检验改善资本市场将产生的影响,但有理由认为改善资本市场也可能对减少不平等现象产生影响。原创性/价值-作者使用Ljungqvist的模型来证明个人相对富裕,因为他们要么拥有固定的投入(例如土地),要么能够投资于人力资本,这反过来又使他们能够获得足够的收入租金或劳动收入保持富裕。另一方面,穷人要么不拥有土地,要么不具备投资人力资本的能力,结果收入低,仍然贫穷。要素end赋或人力资本投资与收入的这种因果关系有助于解释收入分配。使用联合国开发计划署和世界银行的数据对19个发展中经济体进行抽样调查,发现收入/消费不平等的跨国差异可以用人力资本投资的不平等来解释,而人力资本的投资不平等是通过儿童健康不平等来衡量的。以及通过土地基尼指数衡量的教育不平等和土地分配的不平等。这些结果将有助于发展中国家政府确定需要改进的领域,以减少收入/消费不平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号