首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >Economic growth and the concept of diminishing marginal governance effect
【24h】

Economic growth and the concept of diminishing marginal governance effect

机译:经济增长与减少边际治理效应的概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine whether good governance across countries, utilising the Rule of Law indicator of the Worldwide Governance Indicators, is associated with economic growth, measured in terms of real GDP. It is to be noted that in this paper both variables are measured in terms of changes, comparing like with like. It is hypothesised that a country with a high level of economic development and a high level of good governance (typically an economically advanced country) tends to find it more difficult to improve these two variables, when compared to a country with lower levels GDP per capita and good governance (typically an economically backward country). This assumption is termed the diminishing marginal governance effect.Design/methodology/approachThe paper tests the hypothesis that governance improvements are related to real GDP growth, using the panel data regression approach. In this way both variables are measured in terms of changes, comparing like with like. Relevant control variables are utilised to impose the ceteris paribus condition.FindingsThe paper finds that improvements in good governance are statistically and significantly related to economic growth. This confirms the hypothesised diminishing marginal governance effect explained above.Research limitations/implicationsThe main research limitation of this paper is that measuring changes in the Rule of Law indicator over time may be subject to errors given that the Rule of Law score of each year is an average value with related standard deviations, and the latter vary from one year to another and from one country to another.Practical implicationsThe major practical implication of this paper is that good governance matters for economic growth and that in order to produce evidence for this the governance score must be measured in terms of changes and not in terms of levels. Another implication is that equations that compare economic growth with levels of governance are misspecified as they would not be comparing like with like.Social implicationsThere are various beneficial social implications associated with good governance which is considered as a major pillar for orderly social relationships. Economic growth also has important social implications as it means, if properly distributed, improvements in material well-being of the population.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper is that it measures governance in terms of changes and not of levels. Studies on the relationship between governance and economic growth that measure governance in terms of levels generally do not find a positive relationship between the two variables. In using changes in both governance and real GDP, this paper confirms the diminishing marginal effect of governance, hypothesis.
机译:目的本文的目的是利用全球治理指标的法治指标检查各国的善治是否与以实际GDP衡量的经济增长相关联。要注意的是,在本文中,这两个变量都是根据变化来衡量的,比较时采用类似的方式。假设与人均GDP较低的国家相比,经济发展水平高和善治水平高的国家(通常是经济发达的国家)倾向于发现很难改善这两个变量和善政(通常是经济落后的国家)。这种假设被称为边际治理效应的递减。设计/方法论/方法本文使用面板数据回归方法检验了治理改善与实际GDP增长相关的假设。这样,两个变量都根据变化进行了度量,并进行了类似比较。利用相关的控制变量来施加其他条件。研究发现,良好治理的改善在统计上与经济增长显着相关。这证实了上述假设的边际治理效应递减。研究局限性/含义本文的主要研究局限性在于,鉴于每年的法治得分是一个标准,衡量法治指标随时间的变化可能会出现误差。平均值与相关的标准偏差,而后者在一年之间,从一个国家到另一个国家之间有所变化。实际意义本文的主要实际含义是,良好的治理对经济增长至关重要,并且为了为此提供证据,分数必须根据变化而不是水平来衡量。另一个含义是,将经济增长与治理水平进行比较的方程式被错误地指定,因为它们不会像其他人那样进行比较。社会影响善治具有各种有益的社会影响,被认为是有序社会关系的主要支柱。经济增长也具有重要的社会意义,因为这意味着,如果分配得当,将改善人口的物质福祉。原创性/价值本文的独创性在于它根据变化而不是水平来衡量治理。关于治理与经济增长之间关系的研究,从水平上衡量了治理,但在这两个变量之间并没有发现正相关关系。在运用治理和实际GDP的变化时,本文证实了治理假说的边际效应正在减小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号