首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >The effect of governance on public debt: an empirical investigation for the Arabian Gulf countries
【24h】

The effect of governance on public debt: an empirical investigation for the Arabian Gulf countries

机译:治理对公共债务的影响:对阿拉伯海湾国家的实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PurposeThe question of public debt management for both developed and developing economies has created an enormous amount of political as well as academic interest. The purpose of this paper is to examine how governance affects public debt accumulation in the Arabian Gulf countries during the period between 1996 and 2015 period. The six Worldwide Governance indicators (WGI) (voice and accountability (VAA), political stability and the absence of violence/terrorism, government effectiveness (GEFF), regulatory quality (RQ), rule of law (RL) and control of corruption) were used to measure the quality of governance in these countries. The results show that an increase in every governance indicator except control of corruption leads to a decrease in public debt.Design/methodology/approachThe authors estimate a dynamic specification of debt to GDP ratio to study how governance affects public debt accumulation in the Arabian Gulf countries during the 19962015 period. The dependent variable in this study is the ratio of public debt to GDP. This study relies on the six measures of institutions quality given by the WGI. These variables are the VAA, political stability and absence of violence (PSAV)/terrorism, GEFF, RQ, RL and control of corruption. Additional control variables are also incorporated to account for the omitted variables bias. These include the rate of inflation (Al-Marhubi, 2000) and the independent variable lagged one period. The study of the statistical relationship between institutional quality and public debt allows us to quantify the direct effect of governance on public debt, which is the effect that goes through an increase in spending or a reduction in fiscal revenues and not through a decrease in GDP growth. The econometric estimation is carried out using panel fixed effects and GLS random effects.FindingsThe estimation results confirm the core hypothesis, which considers that the poor governance in a country the higher is the ratio of public debt to GDP, ceteris paribus. Indeed, five of the worldwide Governance Index are negatively correlated with public debt ratio. These indices are GEFF, VAA, PSAV, RQ and RL. Empirical findings for other independent variables are consistent with those of empirical studies in the literature. The coefficient on the independent variable per capita income has the theoretically expected negative sign and it is highly statistically significant, implying that the higher the per capita income in a country, the lower the ratio of public debt. The independent variable government expenditure has the theoretically expected positive sign suggesting that the higher the government expenditure, the higher the ratio of public debt. The education variable has negative but not statistically significant coefficients. The independent variables (inflation, unemployment rate and lag debt ratio) have the expected signs and are highly statistically significant, implying that the higher their value in a country, the higher the ratio of public debt to GDP. Having the theoretically expected effect, the GDP growth variable is negatively correlated with public debt ratio but its coefficients are not statistically significant.Originality/valueAlthough the literature on the damaging effects of poor governance on growth is abundant (Tanzi and Davoodi, 2002; Mauro, 1996; Mo, 2001; Mauro, 1996; Brunetti et al., 1997; Campos et al., 1999; Al-Marhubi, 2000; Depken and Lafountain, 2006; Mauro, 1998), only very recently the relationship between institutional quality and public debt accumulation has been addressed. By reviewing the research on political and institutional determinants of public debt, it was found that there are few studies, which have examined regional differences, and even fewer ones have focused on the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Therefore, this paper aims to fill the gap by focusing on this economic region. Furthermore, when studying the relationship between the quality of institutions and the accumulation of public debt, existing studies focus only on corruption index and neglect other determinants of governance. Thus, a second contribution of the study is to investigate how institution quality, through the six WGI, affects public debt accumulation. Furthermore, given the recent rise in public debt in GCC countries, an increasingly important question is what policy actions do these countries need to take to ensure that their debt will be sustainable and will not overwhelm their financial system? we can add: while there has been much attention given to the political and economic explanations of public debt accumulation in developing and developed countries on a global scale, scholars so far have not focused on this debate in high income oil producers.
机译:目的针对发达经济体和发展中经济体的公共债务管理问题已经引起了巨大的政治和学术兴趣。本文的目的是研究1996年至2015年期间治理如何影响阿拉伯海湾国家的公共债务积累。六个全球治理指标(WGI)(语音和问责制(VAA),政治稳定和不存在暴力/恐怖主义,政府效力(GEFF),监管质量(RQ),法治(RL)和腐败控制)是用来衡量这些国家/地区的治理质量。结果表明,除腐败控制外,所有治理指标的增加都会导致公共债务的减少。设计/方法/方法作者估计了债务与GDP的动态关系,以研究治理如何影响阿拉伯海湾国家的公共债务积累在19962015年期间。本研究中的因变量是公共债务与GDP的比率。这项研究依赖于WGI提供的六项机构质量度量。这些变量包括VAA,政治稳定和没有暴力(PSAV)/恐怖主义,GEFF,RQ,RL和腐败控制。还合并了其他控制变量以解决省略的变量偏差。其中包括通货膨胀率(Al-Marhubi,2000年)和自变量滞后一个时期。对机构质量和公共债务之间的统计关系的研究使我们能够量化治理对公共债务的直接影响,即通过增加支出或减少财政收入而不是通过减少GDP增长产生的影响。计量经济学的估计是使用面板固定效应和GLS随机效应进行的。发现估计结果证实了核心假设,即一个国家的治理不善,公共债务与GDP的比率较高。确实,全球治理指数中有五个与公共债务比率负相关。这些索引是GEFF,VAA,PSAV,RQ和RL。其他自变量的经验发现与文献中的经验研究一致。自变量人均收入的系数具有理论上的预期负号,并且在统计上具有很高的意义,这意味着一个国家的人均收入越高,公共债务的比率就越低。自变量政府支出具有理论上预期的正号,表明政府支出越高,公共债务比例越高。教育变量的系数为负但无统计学意义。自变量(通货膨胀,失业率和滞后债务比率)具有预期的迹象,并且具有高度统计意义,这意味着它们在一个国家中的价值越高,公共债务与GDP的比率就越高。尽管具有理论上的预期效果,但GDP增长变量与公共债务比率呈负相关关系,但其系数在统计上并不显着。原创性/价值尽管关于治理不善对增长的破坏作用的文献很多(Tanzi和Davoodi,2002; Mauro, 1996年; Mo,2001年; Mauro,1996年; Brunetti等人,1997年; Campos等人,1999年; Al-Marhubi,2000年; Depken和Lafountain,2006年; Mauro,1998年),但直到最近,制度质量与公共债务积累已得到解决。通过审查有关公共债务的政治和体制决定因素的研究,发现很少有研究研究了地区差异,而针对海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家的研究则更少。因此,本文旨在通过关注该经济区域来填补空白。此外,在研究制度质量与公共债务积累之间的关系时,现有研究仅关注腐败指数,而忽略了其他治理决定因素。因此,该研究的第二个贡献是通过六个WGI调查机构质量如何影响公共债务积累。此外,鉴于海湾合作委员会国家最近的公共债务增加,一个日益重要的问题是这些国家需要采取哪些政策措施来确保其债务可持续,不至于使其金融体系不堪重负?我们可以补充:尽管在全球范围内已经对发展中国家和发达国家对公共债务积累的政治和经济解释给予了极大关注,但到目前为止,学者们还没有将注意力集中在高收入石油生产国的这场辩论上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号