首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Psychology >Old age and prosocial behavior: Social preferences or experimental confounds?
【24h】

Old age and prosocial behavior: Social preferences or experimental confounds?

机译:老年和亲社会行为:社会偏好还是实验混乱?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Experimental and field evidence indicate a positive link between social preferences and age, most strikingly between the elderly and young adults. However, it is possible that the seemingly positive link between age and preferences stems from confounds in experimental procedure. In a dictator game study we find that elderly participants do indeed transfer higher shares of their endowments to their peers than a standard sample of student participants. This result holds good even in treatments accounting for wealth differences and experimenter demand effects. However, we observe no difference in behavior when we compare elderly participants and students who have not previously participated in economic experiments. Accordingly, it is possible that the seemingly stronger social preferences of the elderly are due to confounds associated with lack of experience with economic experiments. In addition, when comparing incentivized and hypothetical transfer decisions, we observe a hypothetical bias in treatments with a "take" framing, but not in treatments with the standard "give" framing. (c) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:实验和现场证据表明,社会偏好与年龄之间存在正向联系,尤其是在老年人和年轻人之间。但是,年龄和偏好之间看似积极的联系可能源于实验程序中的混淆。在独裁者博弈研究中,我们发现,与标准学生参与者相比,老年参与者的确将更高比例的捐赠基金转移给了同龄人。即使在考虑财富差异和实验者需求影响的治疗方法中,此结果也保持良好。但是,当我们比较老年参与者和以前没有参加过经济实验的学生时,我们观察到的行为没有差异。因此,老年人看似更强的社会偏好可能是由于缺乏经济实验经验而造成的混淆。此外,在比较激励性转移假设和假设转移决策时,我们观察到在采用“服用”框架的治疗中的假设偏见,但在使用标准“给予”框架的治疗中没有观察到偏见。 (c)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号