首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Methodology >Becker random behavior and the as-if defense of rational choice theory in demand analysis
【24h】

Becker random behavior and the as-if defense of rational choice theory in demand analysis

机译:需求分析中的贝克尔随机行为和理性选择理论的假设防御

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In discussing rational choice theory (RCT) as an explanation of demand behavior, Becker (1962, Journal of Political Economy, 70, 1-13) proposed a model of random choice in which consumers pick a bundle on their budget line according to a uniform distribution. This model has then been used in various ways to assess the validity of RCT and to support as-if arguments in defense of it. This paper makes both historical and methodological contributions. Historically, it investigates how the interpretation of Becker random behavior evolved between the original 1962 article and the modern experimental literature on individual demand, and surveys six experiments in which it has been used as an alternative hypothesis to RCT. Methodologically, this paper conducts an assessment of the as-if defense of RCT from the standpoint of Becker's model. It argues that this defense is ‘weak’ in a number of senses, and that it has negatively influenced the design of experiments about RCT.View full textDownload full textKeywordsrational choice, random choice, as-if defense of scientific theories, experimental economics, demand analysisJEL Codes:B410, C140, D110, D120Related var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2011.579147
机译:在讨论理性选择理论(RCT)来解释需求行为时,Becker(1962,Journal of政治经济学,70,1-13)提出了一种随机选择模型,在该模型中,消费者根据统一的选择在预算线上选择了捆绑商品。分配。然后,已通过各种方式使用该模型来评估RCT的有效性,并为RCT的辩护提供支持。本文做出了历史和方法上的贡献。从历史上看,它研究了贝克尔随机行为的解释在1962年的原始文章和有关个人需求的现代实验文献之间是如何演变的,并调查了六个被用作RCT替代假设的实验。在方法论上,本文从贝克尔模型的角度对RCT的假设防御进行了评估。它认为这种防御在许多意义上都是“弱”的,并且对RCT的实验设计产生了负面影响。查看全文下载全文关键词理性选择,随机选择,科学理论的防御,实验经济学,需求分析JEL代码:B410,C140,D110,D120相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2011.579147

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号