首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Psychiatry >Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial

机译:心理疗法与支持性心理疗法的认知行为分析系统对早期发作的慢性抑郁症的比较疗效:一项多地点随机对照试验的设计和原理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundEffective treatment strategies for chronic depression are urgently needed since it is not only a common and particularly disabling disorder, but is also considered treatment resistant by most clinicians. There are only a few studies on chronic depression indicating that traditional psycho- and pharmacological interventions are not as effective as in acute, episodic depression. Current medications are no more effective than those introduced 50 years ago whereas the only psychotherapy developed specifically for the subgroup of chronic depression, the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), faired well in one large trial. However, CBASP has never been directly compared to a non-specific control treatment.
机译:背景技术迫切需要针对慢性抑郁症的有效治疗策略,因为它不仅是一种常见且特别致残的疾病,而且大多数临床医生还认为其具有抗药性。关于慢性抑郁症的研究很少,这表明传统的心理和药物干预措施不如急性发作性抑郁症有效。当前的药物并没有比50年前引入的药物更有效,而唯一专门针对慢性抑郁症亚组开发的心理疗法,即心理疗法的认知行为分析系统(CBASP),在一项大型试验中表现良好。但是,从未将CBASP与非特异性对照治疗直接进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号