【24h】

The explanation paradox

机译:解释悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines mathematical models in economics and observes that three mutually inconsistent hypotheses concerning models and explanation are widely held: (1) economic models are false; (2) economic models are nevertheless explanatory; and (3) only true accounts explain. Commentators have typically resolved the paradox by rejecting either one of these hypotheses. I will argue that none of the proposed resolutions work and conclude that therefore the paradox is genuine and likely to stay.View full textDownload full textKeywordsmodels, explanation, idealisationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.661069
机译:本文研究了经济学中的数学模型,发现关于模型和解释的三个相互矛盾的假设被广泛地持有:(1)经济模型是错误的; (2)经济模型仍具有解释性; (3)只有真实的帐户可以解释。评论员通常通过拒绝这些假设中的任何一个来解决这一悖论。我将争辩说,没有任何提议的决议有效,并得出结论,因此,这种悖论是真实的,并且很可能会保留。查看全文下载全文关键字模型,解释,理想化相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike, netvibes,推特,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.661069

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号