首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Literature >Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
【24h】

Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics

机译:宏观经济学和货币经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Somewhere, Milton Friedman is smiling. Casey Mulligan, an economics professor at the University of Chicago, has provided an unalloyed Chicago-style explanation for the U.S. economy's poor performance during and immediately after the Great Recession. The conventional wisdom blames this performance on problems in financial markets. Though economists have yet to fully describe the links between finance and the real economy, authors such as Hall (2010) have written that our general ideas about financial crises have meshed pretty well with recent macroeco-nomic data, particularly the collapse in investment in 2008. Additionally, the slow pace of the ensuing recovery is consistent with Reinhart and Rogoff's (2009) finding that severe financial crises are often followed by long periods of economic stagnation. Mulligan disagrees with the financial focus of recent work on the Great Recession. He concedes that financial turmoil may have had a large initial impact on the economy, but he argues that the biggest effect of the financial crisis was that it encouraged an expansion of the social safety net that reduced the return to working. And as any Chicago economist would predict, rational workers have responded to this expansion by working less.
机译:米尔顿·弗里德曼在某个地方在微笑。芝加哥大学经济学教授凯西·穆里根(Casey Mulligan)为美国经济在大萧条期间及紧随其后的糟糕表现提供了一种非芝加哥式的解释。传统观点将这种表现归咎于金融市场的问题。尽管经济学家尚未完全描述金融与实体经济之间的联系,但霍尔等学者(2010年)写道,我们对金融危机的一般想法已经与最近的宏观经济数据相吻合,尤其是2008年投资的崩溃此外,随后复苏的缓慢步伐与Reinhart and Rogoff(2009)的发现一致,即严重的金融危机通常伴随着长期的经济停滞。穆里根不同意最近关于大萧条的工作在财务上的关注。他承认,金融动荡可能对经济产生了很大的初步影响,但他认为,金融危机的最大影响是它鼓励扩大社会安全网,从而降低了工作回报。正如任何芝加哥经济学家所预测的那样,理性的工人通过减少工作量来应对这种扩张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号