首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >The End of Neoliberalism? An Institutional Analysis of the Arab Uprisings
【24h】

The End of Neoliberalism? An Institutional Analysis of the Arab Uprisings

机译:新自由主义的终结?阿拉伯起义的制度分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The 1980s economic crises in Egypt and Tunisia ushered in the neoliberal economic austerity era, rampant corruption, increased inequality, and socio-economic exclusion. At the same time, it also built a multi-billion-dollar business empire for the elite class connected to the presidential palace. The increasingly arrogant and violent oppression by the state security apparatus ultimately sparked the revolutionary slogans demanding "freedom, jobs, and dignity." This paper argues that little progress has been made to satisfy those demands because the transition governments (and opposition parties) have failed to put forward an alternative economic program to remedy the negative economic consequences of neoliberalism. Focusing exclusively on Tunisia and Egypt, this paper uncovers the neoliberal roots of economic inequality and socio-economic exclusion that have led to the uprisings. It further suggests that the original institutionalist theory of institutional adjustment provides the most adequate framework for achieving the ultimate goals of the Tunisian and Egyptian uprisings. Finally, this paper concludes by outlining the institutional prerequisites for a successful transition to a post-neoliberal system in Tunisia and Egypt.
机译:1980年代埃及和突尼斯的经济危机迎来了新自由主义经济紧缩时代,腐败猖,、不平等加剧和社会经济排斥的时代。同时,它还为与总统府相连的精英阶层建立了价值数十亿美元的商业帝国。国家安全机构越来越嚣张和暴力的镇压最终引发了革命口号,要求“自由,工作和尊严”。本文认为,由于过渡政府(和反对党)未能提出替代性经济计划来补救新自由主义带来的负面经济后果,因此满足这些需求的进展甚微。本文仅针对突尼斯和埃及,揭示了导致起义的经济不平等和社会经济排斥的新自由主义根源。它进一步表明,原始的制度主义制度调整理论为实现突尼斯和埃及起义的最终目标提供了最适当的框架。最后,本文最后概述了突尼斯和埃及成功过渡到新的neolberalical制度的体制前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号