首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control >Is Forward-looking Inflation Targeting Destabilizing? The Role Of Policy's Response To Current Output Under Endogenous Investment
【24h】

Is Forward-looking Inflation Targeting Destabilizing? The Role Of Policy's Response To Current Output Under Endogenous Investment

机译:前瞻性通货膨胀目标是否稳定?内生投资下政策对当前产出的反应作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We show that, with endogenous investment, virtually all monetary policy rules that set a nominal interest rate in response solely to expected future inflation induce real indeterminacy in models with (ⅰ) staggered prices, (ⅱ) staggered prices and staggered wages, and (ⅲ) staggered prices, staggered wages, and firm-specific capital. In (ⅰ), policy's response to current output can help significantly in ensuring determinacy with an infinite labor supply elasticity, but little with empirically plausible labor supply elasticity. In (ⅱ), responding to output always helps a great deal, though under low price stickiness and without capital adjustment cost it may call for a moderate response to output in order to ensure determinacy for a wide range of response to inflation. In (ⅲ), even a tiny response to output can always render equilibrium determinate for a wide range of response to inflation.
机译:我们表明,对于内生投资,几乎所有仅针对预期的未来通货膨胀设置名义利率的货币政策规则都会在具有(ⅰ)交错价格,(ⅱ)交错价格和交错工资以及(ⅲ)的模型中引发实际不确定性),价格交错,工资交错,且公司专有资本。在(ⅰ)中,政策对当前产出的反应可以极大地帮助确保无限劳动力供给弹性的确定性,而对于凭经验看来合理的劳动力供给弹性则无济于事。在(ⅱ)中,对产出的响应总是有很大帮助,尽管在低价格粘性和没有资本调整成本的情况下,它可能要求对产出做出适度的响应,以确保确定对通胀的广泛响应的确定性。在(ⅲ)中,即使对产出的微小反应也总是可以使均衡决定大范围的对通胀的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号