首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control >Within and between systemic country risk. Theory and evidence from the sovereign crisis in Europe
【24h】

Within and between systemic country risk. Theory and evidence from the sovereign crisis in Europe

机译:在系统性国家风险之内和之间。欧洲主权危机的理论与证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We propose a hierarchical Marshall-Olkin model of countrywide systemic risk. At the lower level, we model the systemic risk of a crisis within the banking system (that we call "within" systemic risk) and at the higher level we model the probability of a joint default of the banking system and the public sector (that we call "between" systemic risk). We apply the model to four countries of Northern Europe and four of Southern Europe. In Northern Europe, Germany ranks third for soundness of the banking system but first for country safety. The opposite findings are obtained for Netherlands. In Southern Europe, the Italian banking system ranks first for soundness, quite above Spain, while Italy is aligned with Spain for countrywide risk. Differences in default time correlations between the banking and the public sectors explain these findings.
机译:我们提出了全国性系统性风险的分层Marshall-Olkin模型。在较低的级别上,我们对银行体系内危机的系统风险建模(我们称之为“系统内风险”),在较高的级别上,我们对银行体系与公共部门共同违约的概率进行建模(即我们称之为“介于”系统性风险之间)。我们将模型应用于北欧的四个国家和南欧的四个国家。在北欧,德国在银行体系健全性方面排名第三,但在国家安全方面排名第一。在荷兰获得了相反的发现。在南欧,意大利的银行体系在稳健性方面排名第一,远高于西班牙,而意大利则在全国范围内与西班牙保持一致。银行和公共部门之间默认时间相关性的差异解释了这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号