【24h】

Embezzlement and guilt aversion

机译:挪用公款和罪恶感

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Psychological game theory can contribute to renew the analysis of unethical behavior by providing insights on the nature of the moral costs of dishonesty. We investigate the moral costs of embezzlement in situations where donors need intermediaries to transfer their donations to recipients and where donations can be embezzled before they reach the recipients. We design a novel three-player Embezzlement Mini-Game to study whether intermediaries in the laboratory suffer from guilt aversion and whether guilt aversion affects the decision to embezzle. We show that the proportion of guilt-averse intermediaries is the same irrespective of the direction of guilt and guilt aversion reduces embezzlement. Structural estimates indicate no difference in the effect of guilt aversion toward the donor and toward the recipient on intermediaries' behavior. This is striking as embezzlement affects the earnings of the recipient but not those of the donor. It shows that guilt aversion matters even when decisions have no direct monetary consequences. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:心理博弈论可以通过提供关于不诚实的道德代价的性质的见解,从而有助于更新对不道德行为的分析。在捐赠者需要中介机构将捐赠转移给接受者并且捐赠可以在到达接受者之前被挪用的情况下,我们调查了挪用公款的道德代价。我们设计了一个新颖的三人侵占小游戏,研究实验室中的中介机构是否患有内gui感,以及内version感是否会影响盗用决定。我们表明,无论有罪感的方向如何,都有罪恶感的中间人所占的比例是相同的,并且有罪恶感可以减少贪污。结构性估计表明,对于中介人的行为,对供者和受者的内a厌恶的影响没有差异。这是惊人的,因为挪用公款会影响受款人的收入,但不会影响捐赠者的收入。它表明,即使决策没有直接的金钱后果,内的厌恶也很重要。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号