首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Earthquake Engineering >Seismic Design of MRF-EBF Dual Systems with Vertical Links: EC8 vs Plastic Design
【24h】

Seismic Design of MRF-EBF Dual Systems with Vertical Links: EC8 vs Plastic Design

机译:具有垂直连接的MRF-EBF双系统的抗震设计:EC8与塑料设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the fact that Eccentrically Braced Frames with Vertical Links (VL-EBFs), also referred to as inverted Y-scheme, are codified in Eurocode 8, the issues related to their seismic response and design have not been widely investigated, so that design criteria commonly applied for Eccentrically Braced Frames with Horizontal Links (HL-EBFs) are commonly applied. However, the Theory of Plastic Mechanism Control (TPMC) has been recently extended to the case of VL-EBFs. The aims of this article, on one hand, are to provide a further validation of the recently proposed design procedure, based on TPMC, and, on the other hand, are to compare the seismic performance of dual systems composed by a moment-resisting part and VL-EBF part designed by means of TPMC with those occurring when Eurocode 8 design criteria are applied. The validation of the proposed design procedure is carried out by means of Incremental Dynamic Analyses (IDA). The main purpose of such analyses is the check of the fulfilment of the design goal of TPMC, i.e., the development of a pattern of yielding consistent with the collapse mechanism of global type. Such mechanism is universally recognized as the one leading to the highest energy dissipation capacity. In case of MRF-EBF dual systems, it is characterized by the yielding of all the links and all the beams at their ends. Conversely, all the columns and the diagonal braces remain in elastic range. Obviously, exception is made for the base sections of first story columns. In particular, two case studies are analyzed which are characterized by a different number of stories. Each building structure is designed according to both TPMC and Eurocode 8 provisions. The seismic response obtained is investigated by both push-over and IDA analyses. The attention is focused on the pattern of yielding obtained, the maximum interstory drift demand, the link plastic rotation demand and sharing of the seismic base shear between the moment-resisting part and the bracing part of the structural system. The results obtained point out improvement of the seismic response, compared to Eurocode 8 provisions, achieved by means of TPMC.
机译:尽管在Eurocode 8中对带有垂直连杆的偏心支撑框架(VL-EBF)(也称为倒Y型方案)进行了编纂,但尚未对其与地震响应和设计有关的问题进行广泛研究,因此设计标准通常用于带有水平连杆的偏心支撑框架(HL-EBF)。但是,塑性机械控制理论(TPMC)最近已扩展到VL-EBF的情况。本文的目的,一方面是对基于TPMC的最近提出的设计程序提供进一步的验证,另一方面,是对由抗力矩部件组成的双系统的抗震性能进行比较。和通过TPMC设计的VL-EBF零件,以及应用Eurocode 8设计标准时出现的零件。通过增量动态分析(IDA)对提出的设计程序进行验证。此类分析的主要目的是检查TPMC设计目标的实现情况,即开发一种与全局崩溃机制一致的收益模式。这种机制被普遍认为是导致最高能量消耗能力的一种机制。对于MRF-EBF双系统,其特点是所有链节和其端部的所有光束都屈服。相反,所有列和对角括号都保持在弹性范围内。显然,第一个故事专栏的基础部分是个例外。特别是,分析了两个案例研究,它们的故事数不同。每个建筑结构均根据TPMC和Eurocode 8规定进行设计。通过推覆分析和IDA分析来研究获得的地震响应。注意力集中在所获得的屈服模式,最大的层间漂移需求,链节塑性旋转需求以及结构系统的抗弯部分与支撑部分之间的地震基础剪切力的分配上。获得的结果表明,与通过TPMC进行的Eurocode 8规定相比,地震响应有所改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号