首页> 外文期刊>Journal of E-Government >Electronic vs. Paper Voter Guides and Citizen Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Electronic vs. Paper Voter Guides and Citizen Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:电子与纸质选民指南和公民知识:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scholars are generally aware of a lack of citizen knowledge about politics in the United States. One commonly suggested remedy is the production of nonpartisan voter guides to provide voters a simple and low-cost information source to help inform voters. One of the more significant variations across states is whether the voter guide is provided in a hard-copy format or distributed on the internet. This paper explores the results of a randomized controlled trial comparing a group of registered voters in Utah who received a hard-copy of a paper voter guide against a group registered voters who received a postcard inviting them to view their voter guide online. Results show few statistically significant differences between the paper guide group and the postcard group in knowledge and turnout, and those that are observed slightly favor the postcard/online group.
机译:学者普遍意识到缺乏关于美国政治的公民知识。一个常见建议的补救措施是生产非终止选民指南,为选民提供简单而低成本的信息来源,以帮助推广选民。各种跨越的更重要变化是选民指南是否以硬拷贝格式提供或在因特网上分发。本文探讨了一项随机对照试验的结果,比较犹他州的一组注册选民,他们收到了一份纸选民指南的核心副本,该指南针对收到一名邀请他们在网上查看他们的选民指南的明信片。结果表明,论文指南集团和知识投票中的明信片组之间的统计差异很大,观察到明信片/在线集团的略微赞成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号