首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Documentation >Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies
【24h】

Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies

机译:进行分类活动和控制词汇发展的认知保证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to update and review the concept of warrant in Library and Information Science (LIS) and to introduce the concept of epistemic warrant from philosophy. Epistemic warrant can be used to assess the content of a work; and therefore, it can be a complement to existing warrants, such as literary warrant, in the development of controlled vocabularies. In this proposal, the authors aim to activate a theoretical discussion on warrant in order to revise and improve the validity of the concept of warrant from the user and classifier context to the classificationist context. Design/methodology/approach - The authors have conducted an extensive literary review and close reading of the concept of warrant in LIS and knowledge organization in order to detect the different stances and gaps in which the concept of epistemic warrant might apply. The authors adopted an epistemological approach, in the vein of some of the previous commenters on warrant, such as Hope Olson and Birger Hjorland, and built upon the theoretical framework of different authors working with the concept of warrant outside knowledge organization, such as Alvin Plantings and Alvin Goldman. Findings - There are some authors and critics in the literature that have voiced for a more epistemological approach to warrant (in opposition to a predominantly ontological approach). In this sense, epistemic warrant would be an epistemological warrant and also a step forward toward pragmatism in a prominently empiricist context such as the justification of the inclusion of terms in a controlled vocabulary. Epistemic warrant can be used to complement literary warrant in the development of controlled vocabularies as well as in the classification of works. Originality/value - This paper presents an exhaustive update and revision of the concept of warrant, analyzing, systematizing, and reviewing the different warrants discussed in the LIS literary warrant in a critical way. The concept of epistemic warrant for categorizational activities is introduced to the LIS field for the first time. This paper, and the proposal of epistemic warrant, has the potential to contribute to the theoretical and practical discussions on the development of controlled vocabularies and assessment of the content of works.
机译:目的-本文的目的是更新和回顾图书馆与信息科学(LIS)中的手令的概念,并从哲学的角度介绍认知手令的概念。认知证可用于评估作品的内容;因此,它可以在开发受控词汇表时补充现有的授权书,例如文学授权书。在该提案中,作者旨在激活有关手令的理论讨论,以修订和提高从用户和分类者环境到分类主义者环境的手令概念的有效性。设计/方法论/方法-作者对LIS和知识组织中的手令概念进行了广泛的文学回顾和仔细阅读,以发现认知手令概念可能适用的不同立场和差距。作者采用了认识论的方法,这与以前的一些关于手令的评论者(如Hope Olson和Birger Hjorland)的脉络相同,并且建立在不同作者处理诸如知识组织之外的手令的理论框架之上,例如Alvin Plantings。还有Alvin Goldman。调查结果-文学中有一些作者和批评家表示需要更多的认识论方法来保证(与主要的本体论方法相反)。从这个意义上说,认识论的保证将是认识论的保证,也是在显着的经验主义背景下向实用主义迈出的一步,例如在受控词汇中包含术语的理由。认知权证可用于补充受控词表的开发以及作品分类中的文学权证。原创性/价值-本文对授权书的概念进行了详尽的更新和修订,以一种重要的方式对LIS文学授权书中讨论的各种授权书进行了分析,系统化和审查。用于分类活动的认知保证的概念首次被引入LIS领域。本文和认识论证的提议,有可能为有关控制词汇的发展和作品内容评估的理论和实践讨论做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号