首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Documentation >From fact to fantasy: Scientific illustrations and visual representations in the early work of Gaston Backman
【24h】

From fact to fantasy: Scientific illustrations and visual representations in the early work of Gaston Backman

机译:从事实到幻想:Gaston Backman早期作品中的科学插图和视觉表示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the characteristics and functions of images in scientific practices and how scientific images differ to other types of representation (e.g. textual, numerical or artistic images). To address these questions, the study looks into the illustration practice of the Swedish researcher Gaston Backman, who wrote several books on the origin of the human species, human anatomy, physical anthropology and race biology in the beginning of the twentieth century. Design/methodology/approach A comparative and functional analytical method is applied to show how the images act in his writings and how rhetorical and technical circumstances affect the way the images communicate and document scientific facts and ideas. Theoretically, the study relates to ideas suggesting: images to be serious partakers and vehicles of representation in the practice of science; and the need for images to be schematic and more abstract in comparison to an iconic image in order to work in this practice. Findings The findings of this study show that Backman used both schematic and iconic images in his research writings, and that these different image expressions had different functions: where the former was based on facts and had an informative and scientific function, the latter was based on fantasy/myth and used to promote ideological values and ideas. Originality/value This study stresses the importance of images in the practice of science, i.e. how images alongside verbal or numerical expressions act as important information and knowledge carriers in the work of science. Even though images intermingle with verbal and numerical expression, they also have a unique and specific, a role that needs to be taken seriously and investigated further in the realm of information studies and document studies. The authors also need to be aware that images can have different functions in the scientific practice, and are not always there to carry scientific facts or ideas, but ideologies and fantasies.
机译:目的本文的目的是研究科学实践中图像的特征和功能,以及科学图像与其他类型的表示形式(例如文本,数字或艺术图像)有何不同。为了解决这些问题,本研究调查了瑞典研究员加斯顿·贝克曼(Gaston Backman)的插图创作,他在20世纪初撰写了几本有关人类起源,人体解剖学,自然人类学和种族生物学的书籍。设计/方法/方法一种比较和功能分析方法用于显示图像在其作品中的行为,以及修辞和技术环境如何影响图像传达和记录科学事实和思想的方式。从理论上讲,该研究涉及以下想法:图像是科学实践中的重要分手和代表工具;以及与标志性图像相比,图像必须具有示意图性和抽象性,才能在此实践中发挥作用。调查结果研究结果表明,贝克曼在研究著作中同时使用了示意图和标志性图像,并且这些不同的图像表达具有不同的功能:前者基于事实并具有信息和科学功能,而后者则基于幻想/神话,并用来宣传思想观念和思想。原创性/价值这项研究强调图像在科学实践中的重要性,即图像与口头或数字表达一起如何在科学工作中充当重要的信息和知识载体。即使图像与言语和数字表达混合在一起,它们也具有独特和特定的作用,在信息研究和文献研究领域中,需要认真对待并进一步研究这一作用。作者还需要意识到,图像在科学实践中可能具有不同的功能,并不总是在那里承载科学事实或思想,而是意识形态和幻想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号