首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Effect Of A Low-moisture Buffer Block On Ruminal Ph In Lactating Dairy Cattle Induced With Subacute Ruminal Acidosis
【24h】

Effect Of A Low-moisture Buffer Block On Ruminal Ph In Lactating Dairy Cattle Induced With Subacute Ruminal Acidosis

机译:低水分缓冲液块对亚急性反刍动物酸中毒引起的泌乳牛瘤胃pH值的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a low-moisture buffer block on ruminal pH and milk production in cows induced with subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA). Sixteen ruminally cannulated cows were randomly assigned to treatment (access to buffer blocks) or control (no buffer blocks). Ruminal pH was recorded each minute; dry matter intake (DMI), milk yield, and milk composition were measured daily. The experiment lasted 12 d and consisted of a 3-d pre-SARA period (without access to buffer blocks; d 1 to 3), after which 8 cows were given access to buffer blocks and 8 cows continued without access to buffer blocks. The next 4 d (d 4 to 7) were for evaluating the response to buffer blocks. On d 8, cows were restricted to 50% of previous DMI, and on d 9 SARA was induced (addition of 4 kg of wheat/barley pellet to pre-SARA total mixed ration (TMR). Cows were then monitored for a 3-d recovery period (d 10 to 12). The SARA challenge was successful in decreasing mean ruminal pH and time and area below pH 5.6. Intake of buffer blocks averaged 0.33 kg of DM/cow per day and was greatest on d 4 and d 8. Total DMI (TMR plus buffer block) and yields of milk and milk components were not affected by treatment. Although there was no overall effect of treatment on any of the ruminal pH variables measured, there were significant treatment by period interactions for several ruminal pH variables. Cows on the control treatment tended to experience a greater decrease in mean ruminal pH when induced with SARA than cows with access to buffer blocks (-0.55 vs. -0.20 pH units). Cows on the control treatment also experienced a greater increase in time (9.7 vs. 4.1 h/d) and area (249 vs. 83 min × pH units/d) below pH 5.6 compared with cows with access to buffer blocks. Ruminal volatile fatty acids, lactate, ethanol, and succinate concentrations during the SARArnchallenge did not differ between treatments. Eating behavior was not affected by treatment. Size of the first meal of the day was greater on the SARA challenge day than during the pre-SARA period (11.0 vs. 5.7 kg, as fed). Giving cows access to a buffer-containing molasses block may reduce the duration and the severity of a 1-d SARA challenge.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估低水分缓冲剂对亚急性瘤胃酸中毒(SARA)诱导的母牛瘤胃pH和产奶量的影响。将十六只反刍动物插管的母牛随机分配到治疗组(使用缓冲块)或对照组(无缓冲块)。每分钟记录一次瘤胃pH值;每天测量干物质摄入量(DMI),牛奶产量和牛奶成分。实验持续了12天,包括3天SARA前期(无进入缓冲区;第1至3天),此后有8头母牛进入缓冲区,有8头母牛继续进入无缓冲区。接下来的4 d(d 4至7)用于评估对缓冲块的响应。在第8天,将母牛限制在先前DMI的50%,并在第9天,诱导SARA(在SARA前总混合日粮(TMR)中添加4 kg小麦/大麦颗粒),然后监测母牛的3- d恢复期(d 10至12)。SARA挑战成功地降低了平均瘤胃pH值以及pH值低于5.6的时间和面积。缓冲液块的平均摄入量为每天0.33 kg DM /牛,在d 4和d 8时最大。总DMI(TMR加缓冲液块)以及牛奶和牛奶成分的产量不受治疗的影响,尽管治疗对所测量的任何瘤胃pH变量都没有总体影响,但在几个瘤胃pH的影响下,通过周期相互作用有明显的治疗效果与使用缓冲液的奶牛(-0.55 vs.0.20 pH单位)相比,用SARA诱导的对照奶牛的平均瘤胃pH值倾向于更大的下降(-0.55 vs.0.20 pH单位)。时间(9.7 vs. 4.1 h / d)和面积(249 vs. 83 min×低于pH 5.6的pH单位/ d),与使用缓冲液块的母牛相比。 SARArnchallenge期间的瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸,乳酸,乙醇和琥珀酸酯浓度在两种处理之间没有差异。饮食行为不受治疗的影响。在SARA挑战日,第一天的饭食量要比SARA前时期大(进食时分别为11.0和5.7公斤)。让母牛接触含有缓冲液的糖蜜块可以减少1-d SARA攻击的持续时间和严重性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号