首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Effect of prepartum grouping strategy on displacements from the feed bunk and feeding behavior of dairy cows
【24h】

Effect of prepartum grouping strategy on displacements from the feed bunk and feeding behavior of dairy cows

机译:产前分组策略对奶牛下料位移和饲喂行为的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of the current study was to determine whether providing stable pen management affected displacements from the feed bunk and feeding behavior of prepartum dairy cows. Two hundred and twenty-four nonlactating Jersey primiparous and multiparous cows were enrolled in the study. The 2 treatments were all-in-all-out (AIAO; 44 cows were moved into the close-up prepartum pen as 1 group, with no additions during the 5-wk repetition) or traditional (TRD; with weekly entrance of new cows to maintain a pen density of 44 cows). Cows (253 ± 3 d of gestation) were balanced for parity and projected 305-d mature-equivalent milk yield and assigned randomly to either AIAO or TRD treatments. At enrollment, cows with a body condition score <2 or >4 (1-5 scale; 1 = emaciated and 5 = obese) or with a locomotion score >3 (1-5 scale; 1 = normal gait and 5 = severely lame) were not included. Displacements from the feed bunk were measured weekly for both treatments when TRD cows were moved into the close-up pen (d 0) and additionally on d 1, 2, 3, and 7 for 3 h after fresh feed delivery. A displacement rate was created to take into account differences in stocking density throughout the experiment. Displacement rate was calculated as the number of displacements divided by the number of cows in the pen at that time. Feeding behavior was measured using video 10-min scan sampling for 24-h periods at d 0, 1, 2, and 7. Displacements and feeding behavior were recorded for all 5 wk of each repetition. Treatment × week interactions were detected for number of displacements and displacement rate. The TRD treatment had more displacements from the feed bunk than AIAO in wk 1, 3, and 5, with no differences in wk 2 and 4. Similarly, the TRD treatment had a greater displacement rate than the AIAO treatment in wk 1 and 5, with a tendency in wk 3. No differences between the treatments were detected in wk 2 and 4. A treatment × week interaction existed for feeding time. Cows housed in the AIAO treatment had longer average feeding times in wk 2 with a tendency in wk 3, but spent 39 fewer minutes eating than those in the TRD treatment during the wk 1 of the study. Housing prepartum close-up cows with stable pen management reduced displacements from the feed bunk and altered average daily feeding times.
机译:当前研究的目的是确定提供稳定的围栏管理是否会影响产下奶牛的产蛋排量和喂养行为。该研究纳入了224只非泌乳的泽西岛初生和多胎母牛。这2种处理方法是全力以赴(AIAO; 44头母牛作为一组进入产前特写围栏,在5周重复期间不加药)或传统疗法(TRD;每周有新母牛入场)以保持44头母牛的围栏密度)。平衡母牛(妊娠253±3天)的胎次,并预测305天成熟当量的牛奶产量,并随机分配给AIAO或TRD处理。入学时,身体状况评分<2或> 4(1-5级; 1 =消瘦,5 =肥胖)或运动评分> 3(1-5级; 1 =步态正常,5 =严重la足)的母牛)不包括在内。当将TRD奶牛移入密闭栏(d 0)并在新鲜饲料输送后的d 1、2、3和7放置3 h,每周都要测量两次处理从饲料铺的位移。创建位移率时要考虑到整个实验期间的放养密度差异。排泄率的计算方法是排泄数除以当时笔中的母牛数。使用视频10分钟扫描采样在d 0、1、2和7连续24小时内测量进食行为。记录每次重复的所有5周的位移和进食行为。检测治疗×周交互作用的位移数和位移率。在第1、3和5周中,TRD处理从饲料铺上的位移大于AIAO,在第2周和第4周中没有差异。类似地,在第1、5周中,TRD处理的位移速率大于AIAO处理。在第3周和第3周都有趋势。在第2周和第4周中未发现处理之间的差异。对于进食时间,存在治疗×周交互作用。在研究的第1周期间,采用AIAO处理的奶牛在第2周的平均饲喂时间更长,有第3周的趋势,但进食时间却比TRD处理的要少39分钟。通过稳定的围栏管理,为产前特写奶牛提供住房,可减少从饲喂棚中排出的粪便并改变平均每日饲喂时间。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2014年第5期|2800-2807|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108;

    Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108;

    Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108;

    Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    prepartum dairy cow; feeding behavior; social behavior;

    机译:产前奶牛喂养行为;社会行为;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:23:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号