首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Technical note: Comparison of 4 electronic handheld meters for diagnosing hyperketonemia in dairy cows
【24h】

Technical note: Comparison of 4 electronic handheld meters for diagnosing hyperketonemia in dairy cows

机译:技术说明:用于诊断奶牛高酮血症的4种电子手持式仪表的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate 4 handheld ketone meters for use in on-farm β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) monitoring of hyperketonemia in transition dairy cows. Blood samples taken from 250 Holstein cows between 262 d pregnant and 15 d in milk were evaluated on 4 different handheld ketone meters: Precision Xtra (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), TaiDoc (Pharmadoc, Liidersdorf, Germany), Nova Max (Nova Biomedical, Billerica, MA), and Nova Vet (Nova Biomedical). Samples were screened using the Precision Xtra and tested on the remaining 3 m if the sample BHB concentration fell into predetermined ranges. A total of 89 samples were used for analysis. Performance of each meter was compared with the average of 2 plasma BHB concentrations both determined by a gold standard spectrophotometric Randox assay performed at 2 independent laboratories. Agreement between the 2 laboratories was very strong (Pearson correlation = 0.998). All meters had Pearson correlation coefficients greater than 0.95. The Precision Xtra and TaiDoc meters were 100.0% sensitive and 73.5% specific at a BHB concentration cut point of 1.2 mmol/L. The Nova Vet and Nova Max meters had sensitivities of 94.9 and 74.4% and specificities of 91.8 and 100.0%, respectively, at the same cut point. Agreement between the gold standard and the handheld meter was the best for the Nova Vet meter when evaluated using a Bland Altman graph with a mean BHB difference of 0.08 mmol/L. Trends in bias were noted with the Precision Xtra and Nova Max meters resulting in increasing average discrepancy between the gold standard and the meter for both at higher plasma BHB concentrations and mean BHB differences of -0.34 and 0.26 mmol/L, respectively. The coefficient of variation was <10% for the Precision Xtra, TaiDoc, and Nova Vet meters, and <15% for the Nova Max meter. We conclude that the TaiDoc and Nova Vet meters, similar to the already validated Precision Xtra meter, are acceptable for use in on-farm testing for monitoring and treatment of hyperketonemia.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估4台手持式酮计,用于在农场中对过渡型奶牛的高酮血症进行β-羟基丁酸酯(BHB)监测。在4种不同的手持式酮测定仪上评估了从262 d至15 d母乳中的250头荷斯坦奶牛的血样:Precision Xtra(伊利诺伊州Abbott Park的Abbott实验室),TaiDoc(德国Liidersdorf的Pharmadoc),Nova Max(Nova)生物医学,马萨诸塞州比勒里卡)和新星兽医(Nova Biomedical)。如果Preparation Xtra样品的BHB浓度落在预定范围内,则使用Precision Xtra筛选样品并在剩余的3 m上进行测试。总共使用了89个样品进行分析。将每个仪表的性能与两个血浆BHB浓度的平均值进行比较,这两个浓度均由在2个独立实验室进行的金标准分光光度Randox测定法测定。两个实验室之间的一致性非常强(皮尔森相关系数= 0.998)。所有仪表的皮尔逊相关系数均大于0.95。在BHB浓度降低点1.2 mmol / L时,Precision Xtra和TaiDoc仪表的灵敏度为100.0%,特异性为73.5%。在相同的切割点,Nova Vet和Nova Max仪表的灵敏度分别为94.9%和74.4%,特异度分别为91.8和100.0%。当使用Bland Altman图进行评估时,金标准品与手持式仪表之间的一致性是Nova Vet仪表的最佳协议,平均BHB差为0.08 mmol / L。使用Precision Xtra和Nova Max仪表记录了偏差趋势,导致血浆BHB浓度较高和平均BHB差分别为-0.34和0.26 mmol / L时,金标准和仪表之间的平均差异越来越大。对于Precision Xtra,TaiDoc和Nova Vet仪表,变异系数<10%,对于Nova Max仪表,变异系数为<15%。我们得出的结论是,与已经验证的Precision Xtra仪表相似,TaiDoc和Nova Vet仪表可以用于农场测试中以监测和治疗高血钾症。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2016年第11期|9136-9142|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;

    Clinic for Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universitat Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany;

    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    dairy cow; hyperketonemia; β-hydroxybutyrate; cowside meter;

    机译:奶牛;高酮血症β-羟基丁酸酯;牛头计;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号