首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Animal Behavior and Well-Being 1
【24h】

Animal Behavior and Well-Being 1

机译:动物行为和福祉1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We investigated how social housing in a calf’s first weeks of life affectsmilk feeding behavior, health, and subsequent adaptation to an autofeeder.Holstein heifer calves were randomly assigned to individual (n = 16calves) or pair-housing (n = 8 pairs) at birth and received milk via a teatbucket (8 L/d; twice daily). Calves were mingled between treatments andgroup-housed (8 calves/pen) at 13 ± 2 d of age and fed via an autofeeder(12 L/d). At birth and upon introduction to the autofeeder, we recordedthe number of sessions (based on twice daily feed delivery or autofeederchecks) where the calf did not feed voluntarily and required assistance.We measured daily milk intake and health (scouring events) from birthand daily milk feeding behavior for 1 wk following introduction to theautofeeder. Data were summarized by pair of calves (averaging acrossadjacent and consecutively enrolled individually-housed calves) and wereanalyzed in a general linear mixed model with housing treatment as a fixedeffect, pen as a random effect for post-grouping outcomes, and day as arepeated measure for milk feeding behavior. Social housing did not affectthe number of assists required to learn to use the teat bucket (1.9; SE = 0.2;P = 0.26) or milk intake in the first 2 wk of life (6.1 L/d; SE = 0.2; P = 0.7).All calves developed scours and age when first diagnosed with scours didnot differ (6.2 d of age; SE = 0.6; P = 0.4) but pair-housed calves tended toscour for fewer days (4.2 vs. 5.8 d; SE = 0.6; P = 0.06). Upon introductionto the autofeeder, calves did not differ in the number of assists requiredto feed voluntarily (1.5; SE = 0.2; P = 0.7) but previously individually-housed calves occupied the feeder for longer (34.9 vs. 26.6 min/d; SE= 3.1; P = 0.003) without affecting milk intake (7.3 L/d; SE = 0.5; P= 0.6) or visit frequency (4.0 visits/d; SE = 0.4; P = 0.4). These resultssuggest that behavior and learning ability surrounding milk feeding areminimally affected by social housing, but pair-housing in the first weeksof life had a positive effect on health and efficiency of autofeeder use.
机译:我们调查了小腿的社会住房如何影响生命的第一周牛奶喂养行为,健康和随后的适应自身化。HOLSTEIN HEIFER小牛随机分配给个体(n = 16犊牛)或分壳(n = 8双)在出生时和通过奶头接受牛奶铲斗(8升/天;每日两次)。犊牛在治疗和治疗之间混合在一起在13±2 d时组合(8个小牛/笔),并通过自动送货器喂食(12 L / D)。在出生时,我们录制了自动赠送者会话数(基于每日两次馈送传递或AutoFeeder检查)小腿没有自愿喂养和必要的帮助。我们从出生中测量了每日奶奶和健康(擦洗事件)和每日牛奶饲养行为为1 WK介绍后autofeeder。通过对小牛(平均)总结了数据邻近和连续注册单独容纳的小牛)并是用壳体处理的一般线性混合模型分析为固定效果,笔作为分组后结果的随机效应,以及一天作为一个对牛奶饲养行为的重复措施。社会住房没有影响学习使用乳液桶所需的助攻数量(1.9; SE = 0.2;P = 0.26)或牛奶摄入量在前2周的寿命中(6.1L / D; SE = 0.2; P = 0.7)。所有犊牛在首次被诊断出来时开发了休闲和年龄没有差异(6.2天; SE = 0.6; p = 0.4),但配对犊牛倾向于冲刷的日子较少(4.2与5.8 d; se = 0.6; p = 0.06)。在介绍时到AutoFeeder,Calves在所需的助攻数量没有差异自愿进料(1.5; se = 0.2; p = 0.7),但先前单独地 - 牛犊占用了饲养饲养者(34.9与26.6 min / d; se= 3.1; p = 0.003)不影响奶弧(7.3 L / D; SE = 0.5; p= 0.6)或访问频率(4.0访问/ D; SE = 0.4; P = 0.4)。这些结果建议喂奶喂养的行为和学习能力是最低限度受社会住房影响,而是在第一周的配对住房生活对自身融合器使用的健康和效率产生了积极影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2020年第suppla期|211-215|共5页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号