首页> 外文期刊>Journal for Cultural Research >Where is the Why if the What is in How? The Issue of Intent in “Unintentional Ideal Communities”
【24h】

Where is the Why if the What is in How? The Issue of Intent in “Unintentional Ideal Communities”

机译:为何在哪里,为什么在哪里? “无意识的理想社区”中的意图问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article examines the place of intent in the development of “unintentional ideal” communities in relation to the wider realm of utopian practice. A utopian intent may seem to be inherent to utopia, indeed as crucial in identifying or establishing a “utopia”. Intent might be assumed to be less of an issue in utopian practice than with utopian literature; for the latter, the intentions of the creators or founders of a community may be found in statements, charters or core documents stating the beliefs or principles upon which a community is founded — they aim to realise utopia. However, a turn to resisting the closure, perfection or “blueprinted” nature of utopias has enabled an expansion of utopian studies to embrace the unknown, the processual and the open-ended. Intent is therefore problematic; indeed, the processual turn in utopian studies may obviate the need to consider intent at all. Yet utopists have seldom interrogated the nature of intent in an expanded utopian schema. Drawing on historical research — from ex-slave frontier communities of the nineteenth-century USA, and “pirate” communities of the late seventeenth/early eighteenth centuries — this article proposes that communities may develop which may be described as “utopian” or “ideal”, despite no express utopian intent amongst their founders or inhabitants of the community. This article therefore examines the notion of intent in practical utopias, and critically explores the implications of “unintentional” utopias for utopian thought.
机译:本文探讨了与无意识的实践领域有关的“无意识的理想”社区发展的意图。乌托邦的意图似乎是乌托邦固有的,实际上对于确定或建立“乌托邦”至关重要。在乌托邦实践中,与乌托邦文学相比,意图可能不那么重要。对于后者,社区的创建者或创始人的意图可以在声明,章程或核心文件中找到,这些陈述阐明了社区所基于的信念或原则,旨在实现乌托邦。然而,抗拒乌托邦的封闭,完善或“蓝图”性质的转变使乌托邦研究得以扩展,以涵盖未知,过程性和开放性。因此,意图是有问题的;实际上,乌托邦研究的过程性转变可能完全消除了对意图的考虑。然而,乌托邦主义者很少质疑扩张的乌托邦图式中意图的本质。借鉴历史研究(来自19世纪美国的前奴隶制边境社区以及17世纪末/ 18世纪初的“海盗”社区),本文建议,可以发展可能被描述为“乌托邦”或“理想”的社区”,尽管社区的创始人或居民没有明确的乌托邦意图。因此,本文考察了实用乌托邦中的意图概念,并批判性地探讨了“无意”乌托邦对乌托邦思想的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号