【24h】

High Court of Justice

机译:高等法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present case concerned an appeal by way of Case Stated following the conviction of W for the possession of psilocybin mushrooms, a Class A drug, contrary to s. 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1972. W admitted possessing dried mushrooms which were found during a search of his premises having, by his own admission, picked them from a field in October 2013. Scientific analysis of the mushrooms was undertaken prior to the trial which identified them as psilocybin but on the day of the trial a 'difficulty had arisen because... there had not been an agreement to that evidence by the defence' (at [40]). In the absence of any scientific evidence the Crown decided to proceed, relying instead on the evidence of Mr Forster, a civilian working for the police, who the magistrates 'found to be an expert in the identification of drugs' (at [8]).
机译:本案涉及在W被定罪后通过案件陈述方式对拥有psilocybin蘑菇(一种A类药物,与s相反)的上诉。 W承认1972年《滥用药物法》第5条第2款。W承认拥有干蘑菇,他在自己的处所搜查时发现了这些干蘑菇,他自己承认是在2013年10月从田间摘下它们的。之前对蘑菇进行了科学分析鉴定他们为psilocybin的试验,但是在试验的那天,“由于[...]辩护方未就该证据达成协议而出现了困难”(在[40])。在没有任何科学证据的情况下,官方决定继续进行诉讼,而是依靠福斯特先生的证据,他是为警察工作的平民,裁判官“发现他是毒品识别方面的专家”(在[8]) 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号