首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contemporary European studies >Modelling the Diversity of EU Members'Paths to European Integration and Policy Implications for Taiwan-China Relations
【24h】

Modelling the Diversity of EU Members'Paths to European Integration and Policy Implications for Taiwan-China Relations

机译:模拟欧盟成员通往欧洲一体化道路的多样性以及对台湾与中国关系的政策含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper investigates the diverse approaches ofEU members' integration with the EU through modelling, and assesses the applicability of each model to Taiwan-China relations. Building upon two variables: 'the association with national identity and reorientation or not', and 'being the leading or founding member or not '-four EU members' integrative models stand out. The German model is proved to be the most integrationist, followed by the Finnish and the French models. The UK model appears to be the least committed. Due to sovereignty controversies, the visionary German and French models are not applicable to Taiwan-China integrations and the prospects are for the pragmatic Finnish model at best, and the UK model at worst. These modelling outcomes can then explain why the growing economic integration between the two sides has not produced spillover effects into the political arena. This paper therefore argues that it would be in China's interest to make Taiwan an equal leading player in Taiwan—China integrations, and to transform its 'one-China policy' from the current political and sovereignty contents to a cultural and value-laden concept. Among the theories being examined, (neo)realist-constructivism demonstrates more applicability titan two mainstream integration theories - neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism.
机译:本文通过建模研究了欧盟成员与欧盟一体化的各种方式,并评估了每种模式对台湾与中国关系的适用性。建立在两个变量的基础上:“与国家身份或是否重新定位的关联”和“成为领导者或创始成员或不是'四个欧盟成员'”整合模型脱颖而出。事实证明,德国模式是最一体化的,其次是芬兰模式和法国模式。英国模式似乎承诺最少。由于主权争议,有远见的德国和法国模式不适用于中国台湾一体化,而实用主义的芬兰模式最好,英国模式则前景广阔。这些模型化的结果可以解释为什么两国之间日益增长的经济一体化并未在政治领域产生溢出效应。因此,本文认为,使台湾成为台中一体化的平等领导者,并将其“单中国政策”从目前的政治和主权内容转变为一种文化和价值观念,符合中国的利益。在研究的理论中,(新)现实主义建构主义表现出更大的适用性,这是两种主流整合理论-新功能主义和政府间主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号