...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consumer policy >South African Complaint Forums in the Retail Industry: a Survey of Literature and Some Lessons from the EU
【24h】

South African Complaint Forums in the Retail Industry: a Survey of Literature and Some Lessons from the EU

机译:南非零售业投诉论坛:文献调查和欧盟的一些经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

South African consumers receiving poor service in the retail industry want to complain, but have limited or no knowledge of the available consumer complaint forums. The consumer complaint forums in the retail industry can generally be divided into those established in terms of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and other complaint forums. Before consumers can decide which forum they want to lodge their complaint with, they first need to identify possible complaint forums and then measure each forum according to certain factors. This study made a unique contribution by identifying possible factors which a consumer can refer to in this regard. In developing these factors, guidance was taken from the EU Consumer ADR Directive and the ODR Regulation. The factors suggested in this study included the following: the cost of and time spent on lodging a complaint, the effective functioning of the complaint forum, transparency in the operation of the complaint forum, the relief that a consumer may obtain from the complaint forum, and the user-friendliness of the complaint process. The National Consumer Tribunal, the National Consumer Commission, the Consumer Goods and Services Ombud, and ordinary civil courts were assessed using the above factors. A limitation of this study was that not all complaint forums could be assessed in terms of these factors, due to the lack of publicly available information. This study found that even though South Africans now have more complaint forums at their disposal, this does not translate into positive outcomes for aggrieved consumers. The strength of these forums lies in the buy-in received from both consumers and retailers. True consumer power arises through collective action after careful investigation, and resolving individual complaints may not result in the change of consumer policy which is actually what is required in the long run.
机译:南非零售业服务水平低下的消费者希望投诉,但是对可用的消费者投诉论坛知之甚少。零售行业的消费者投诉论坛通常可以分为根据2008年第68号《消费者保护法》和其他投诉论坛建立的论坛。在消费者决定要向哪个论坛提出投诉之前,他们首先需要确定可能的投诉论坛,然后根据某些因素对每个论坛进行评估。通过确定消费者在这方面可以参考的可能因素,这项研究做出了独特的贡献。在开发这些因素时,参考了欧盟消费者ADR指令和ODR法规。这项研究建议的因素包括:提出投诉的成本和时间,投诉论坛的有效运作,投诉论坛的运营透明性,消费者可以从投诉论坛获得的救济,以及投诉程序的用户友好性。使用以上因素评估了国家消费者法庭,国家消费者委员会,消费者商品和服务申诉专员以及普通民事法院。这项研究的局限性在于,由于缺乏公开的信息,并非所有投诉论坛都可以根据这些因素进行评估。这项研究发现,即使南非人现在拥有更多的投诉论坛可供使用,但这并不能为受屈的消费者带来积极的结果。这些论坛的优势在于来自消费者和零售商的买入。真正的消费者力量是经过认真调查后通过集体行动而产生的,解决个人投诉可能不会导致改变消费者政策,而这实际上是长期需要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号