首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Consumer Marketing >Accountability moderates the effects of egoistic and altruistic appeals in prosocial messages
【24h】

Accountability moderates the effects of egoistic and altruistic appeals in prosocial messages

机译:责任抚养自我和利他主义吸引力在女性信息中的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to clarify the relationship between consumer accountability and responses to egoistic and altruistic appeals. It proposes that when consumers' relationships with others are heightened in the form of accountability, different prosocial message appeals become effective. The study expands the understanding of how marketing may enhance the efficacy of prosocial campaign messages. Design/methodology/approach - The study utilized three online experimental studies to test hypotheses across different population samples and health product categories. Self-benefit and other-benefit appeals were tested to decrease meat consumption (Study 1), increase vaccination intent (Study 2) and purchase oxybenzone-free sunscreen (Study 3). Results provide converging evidence for the proposed interaction between appeal type and accountability. Findings - When consumers believe their choices will be known or discussed with others, they are more persuaded by other-benefit or altruistic appeals. Contrary to some existing research, Study 3 found that when public accountability was heightened, hybrid appeals were less effective than a solely altruistic appeal in generating purchase intent, digital engagement and attitude change, even controlling for social desirability. Research limitations/implications - Public accountability was manipulated only in an online setting, and future studies should replicate with greater ecological validity. Results inform how scholars, brands and organizations should approach message efficacy in prosocial campaigns, particularly when an individual's relationship with others may become salient. Practical implications - The paper includes implications for the development and deployment of various organizational strategies such as changing the appeal depending on where a message will be viewed by consumers. Importantly for digital campaigns, maximum digital engagement arises from an altruistic appeal in a public context. Originality/value - This paper fulfills an identified need to understand how organizations can successfully encourage prosocial consumer behavior, as well as bridges literature gaps on accountability and appeal efficacy.
机译:目的 - 本文旨在澄清消费者问责制之间的关系,对自我和利他主义呼吁的关系。它建议,当消费者与他人的关系以问责制的形式提高时,不同的女性留言呼吁变得有效。该研究扩大了对营销如何增强口语竞选信息的疗效的理解。设计/方法/方法 - 该研究利用了三种在线实验研究,以测试不同人口样本和健康产品类别的假设。检测自我利益和其他福利呼吁降低肉类消费(研究1),增加疫苗接种意图(研究2)并购买无氧释放的防晒剂(研究3)。结果为拟议的上诉类型和问责制之间提出的互动提供融合证据。调查结果 - 当消费者认为他们的选择将被别人或与他人讨论,他们更符合其他福利或利他主义的上诉。与某些现有的研究相反,研究3发现,当公共责任提高时,混合呼吁比仅仅在制定购买意图,数字参与和态度变化方面,甚至控制社会可取性的单独吸引力。研究限制/影响 - 公共责任仅在在线环境中操纵,未来的研究应以更大的生态有效性复制。结果通知学者,品牌和组织如何在口语运动中接近消息效能,特别是当个人与他人的关系可能会变得突出时。实际意义 - 本文包括对各种组织策略的开发和部署的影响,例如改变上诉,这取决于消费者将看到邮件的邮件。重要的是,对于数字运动,最大的数字参与在公共上下文中的利他主义上诉中出现。原创/价值 - 本文履行了一个确定的需要了解组织如何成功鼓励口语消费者行为,以及关于问责制和上诉疗效的桥梁文学差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号