首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Consumer Marketing >Order of justice in queues of emerging markets
【24h】

Order of justice in queues of emerging markets

机译:新兴市场队列司法的顺序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Extant literature on queuing has identified service queues as social systems where social justice is an important factor for service evaluation. First-order justice, defined as a first-come first-served (FCFS) process, has been found to be a necessary condition of social justice and positive evaluation. Second-order justice, defined as equal waiting time, has been found to be an additional factor which comes into play only when first-order justice is met. This paper aims to show that in the emerging market situation, the above definitions of justice and the order mentioned above does not work. Design/methodology/approach - Instead of equal wait, the study has focused on equitable wait, i.e. waiting duration is in sync with the service needs. Three experiments have been performed to establish the hypotheses suggested. Findings - FCFS is found not to be the necessary condition as it was in the extant literature and can be relaxed sometimes to get higher service evaluation by ensuring justice from the equitable wait. The study also portrays the interaction effects of the two types of social justice on service evaluation. Moreover, the impact of justice from equitable wait on service evaluations is found to be moderated by perceived personal connect of the service provider and the consumer, perceived importance of system and process and perceived ability of the service provider of capacity improvement and mediated by perceived control of service provider on providing the justice of equitable wait. Research limitations/implications - The study contributes toward the understanding of social justice in service queues. It also contributes to the literature of attribution theory and consumer betrayal. Practical implications - The study provides suggestions to retail managers in emerging markets to choose queue management strategies depending on the size of the retail shops and consumers' expectations from them. Originality/value - The study introduces the concept of justice from the equitable wait, which is original in the queuing literature to the best of the author's knowledge. The study also finds a new order of justice in the emerging market scenario.
机译:目的 - 排队的现存文献已将服务队列确定为社会制度,社会正义是服务评估的重要因素。已经发现一流的正义,被定义为首先第一送达(FCFS)过程,是社会正义和积极评估的必要条件。已被发现定义为等候时间的二阶司法是额外的因素,只有在满足一阶司法时才能发挥作用。本文旨在表明,在新兴市场情况下,上述司法的定义和上述订单不起作用。设计/方法/方法 - 而不是等于等等,研究专注于公平等待,即等待持续时间与服务需求同步。已经进行了三个实验,以建立建议的假设。调查结果 - 发现FCFS不是必要的条件,因为它在现存文学中,有时可以通过确保公平等待的司法来获得更高的服务评估。该研究还描绘了两种社会正义对服务评估的互动效应。此外,司法从公平等待服务评估的影响被发现通过感知服务提供商和消费者的个人联系,感知系统和过程的重要性以及服务提供者的能力改善和通过感知控制介导的能力的重要性服务提供商在提供公平等待的正义方面。研究限制/影响 - 该研究有助于了解服务队列中的社会正义。它还有助于归因理论和消费者背叛的文献。实际意义 - 该研究为新兴市场中的零售经理提供了建议,以选择队列管理策略,根据零售商店和消费者对其的期望。原创性/价值 - 研究介绍了公平等待的司法概念,这是作者知识的最佳排队文学中的原始文学。该研究还在新兴市场情景中找到了新的正义秩序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号