首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management >Comparison of Preproject Planning for Green and Conventional Buildings
【24h】

Comparison of Preproject Planning for Green and Conventional Buildings

机译:绿色建筑和常规建筑项目前期规划的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The importance of green buildings has been frequently highlighted. However, barriers such as greater complexity, lack of understanding of sustainability, and the perception of a greater possibility of cost overrun have hindered the dissemination of green buildings. More planning efforts for green buildings can presumably help mitigate these barriers. This paper investigates preproject planning efforts for green and conventional building projects. Project-level data were collected (124 in total, 71 from conventional building projects and 53 from green building projects), with project data consisting of general information about the project, a Project Definition Rate Index (PDRI) survey, and cost performance. The project data were categorized into four groups based on their project type (green and conventional) and cost performance (actual cost on/under budget and over budget). For the four groups, a two-way analysis of variance test was used to compare the degree of preproject planning efforts measured by PDRI. The analysis indicated that green projects tend to have more investment in preproject planning efforts than conventional projects, and the difference was marginally statistically significant at the level of α = 0.05. In addition, a comparison of the mean PDRI values of the four groups revealed that green projects with a superior cost performance invest more in preproject planning efforts than other groups, and the difference was statistically meaningful. From the interaction effect, we also found that the impact of preproject planning on cost performance is more critical for green projects than for conventional projects. Regarding the preproject planning category, we found that green projects with superior cost performance tend to involve more planning with regard to business strategy, project requirements, site information, building programming, and building/project design parameters. These findings make two contributions. First, the findings help practitioners justify additional preproject planning efforts for green projects. Second, some of the results of this study will be useful to practitioners initiating sustainable projects by helping with the determination of which aspects of green buildings should involve more extensive planning. These findings will help reduce the possibility of cost overruns and allow more green projects to be deployed in order to address the need for sustainability.
机译:人们经常强调绿色建筑的重要性。但是,诸如更高的复杂性,对可持续性的缺乏理解以及成本超支的可能性更大等障碍阻碍了绿色建筑的传播。绿色建筑的更多规划工作大概可以帮助减轻这些障碍。本文研究了绿色和常规建筑项目的项目前规划工作。收集了项目级别的数据(总共124个,常规建筑项目71个,绿色建筑项目53个),项目数据包括有关该项目的一般信息,项目定义率指数(PDRI)调查和成本绩效。根据项目数据的类型(绿色和常规)和成本绩效(实际成本超出预算/超出预算以及超出预算)将项目数据分为四类。对于这四个组,使用了方差分析的双向分析来比较由PDRI测量的项目前规划工作的程度。分析表明,绿色项目倾向于比常规项目在项目前规划工作上投入更多,并且在α= 0.05的水平上,该差异具有统计学意义。此外,对这四个组的平均PDRI值进行比较后发现,具有较高成本绩效的绿色项目比其他组在项目前规划工作上的投入更多,并且该差异具有统计意义。从交互效应中,我们还发现,对于绿色项目而言,项目前计划对成本绩效的影响比传统项目更为关键。关于项目前规划类别,我们发现具有较高成本绩效的绿色项目在业务战略,项目需求,场地信息,建筑规划和建筑/项目设计参数方面往往涉及更多规划。这些发现做出了两个贡献。首先,研究结果可帮助从业人员证明绿色项目的其他项目前规划工作的合理性。其次,这项研究的一些结果将有助于确定可持续建筑的哪些方面应涉及更广泛的规划,从而对从业人员发起可持续项目很有用。这些发现将有助于减少成本超支的可能性,并允许部署更多的绿色项目,以满足可持续发展的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号