首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning >Cultivating creative thinking in engineering student teams: Can a computer-mediated virtual laboratory help?
【24h】

Cultivating creative thinking in engineering student teams: Can a computer-mediated virtual laboratory help?

机译:在工程学生团队中培养创造性思维:可以进行计算机介导的虚拟实验室帮助吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In engineering design, engineers must be able to think creatively, effectively toggling between divergent thinking (developing multiple novel ideas) and convergent thinking (pursuing an appropriate idea using engineering analyses). However, creative thinking is not emphasized in many undergraduate engineering programs. In this empirical study, we analyze the divergent thinking of teams working on a virtual laboratory project. Fifteen student teams' solution paths-as represented by Model Maps-were analyzed to characterize and compare the various elements of divergent thinking: fluency, flexibility, and originality. The solution paths of these teams were compared in two physical laboratory projects and to experts completing the same virtual laboratory project. We found that students demonstrated more divergent thinking in the virtual laboratory project than in the physical laboratory projects; yet, divergent thinking and quality of solution did not correlate. There was little difference between measured elements of divergent thinking between student teams and experts.
机译:在工程设计中,工程师必须能够创造性地思考,有效地在发散思维(开发多个新颖思想)和会聚思维之间(使用工程分析追求适当的想法)。然而,许多本科工程计划中没有强调创造性思维。在这项实证研究中,我们分析了在虚拟实验室项目工作的团队的分歧思维。分析了十五个学生团队的解决方案路径 - 分析了模型地图 - 表征和比较分歧思维的各种元素:流畅性,灵活性和创意。这些团队的解决方案在两个物理实验室项目中进行了比较和完成相同虚拟实验室项目的专家。我们发现学生在虚拟实验室项目中表现出比物理实验室项目更为不同的思考;然而,解决方案的发散思维和质量并未相关。学生团队与专家的不同思想元素之间几乎没有差异。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号