首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computational science >Multivariate fault detection and classification using interval principal component analysis
【24h】

Multivariate fault detection and classification using interval principal component analysis

机译:基于区间主成分分析的多元故障检测与分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a linear data analysis tool that aims to reduce the dimensionality of a dataset, while retaining most of the variation found in it. It transforms the variables of a dataset into a new set, called the principal components, using linear combinations of the original variables. PCA is a powerful statistical technique used in research for fault detection, classification and feature extraction. Interval principal component analysis (IPCA) is an extension to PCA designed to apply PCA to large datasets using interval data generated from single-valued samples. In this paper, three IPCA methods are compared: centers IPCA, midpoint-radii IPCA, and symbolic covariance IPCA, and methods for fault detection and classification using interval data are described. Fault detection and classification applications are respectively carried out through two examples, one using synthetic and the other using real data, and the results are compared to those of the classical PCA.The results show that IPCA methods have a higher detection rate than classical PCA, for the same false alarm rate. Moreover, IPCA methods are capable of differentiating the type of fault to a high degree of accuracy, unlike classical PCA. Interval centers were capable of detecting changes in mean, while interval radii were capable of detecting changes in variance. Furthermore, for data classification, the results show that MRIPCA had a higher classification precision than other IPCA methods and classical PCA.
机译:主成分分析(PCA)是一种线性数据分析工具,旨在减少数据集的维数,同时保留其中发现的大部分变化。它使用原始变量的线性组合将数据集的变量转换为称为主成分的新集。 PCA是一种用于研究故障检测,分类和特征提取的强大统计技术。间隔主成分分析(IPCA)是PCA的扩展,旨在使用从单值样本生成的间隔数据将PCA应用于大型数据集。本文比较了三种IPCA方法:中心IPCA,中点半径IPCA和符号协方差IPCA,并描述了使用间隔数据进行故障检测和分类的方法。通过两个示例分别进行故障检测和分类应用,一个使用合成数据,另一个使用真实数据,并将结果与​​经典PCA进行比较。结果表明,IPCA方法的检测率比经典PCA高,对于相同的误报率。而且,与传统的PCA不同,IPCA方法能够以高精确度区分故障类型。间隔中心能够检测平均值的变化,而间隔半径能够检测方差的变化。此外,对于数据分类,结果表明,MRIPCA具有比其他IPCA方法和经典PCA更高的分类精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号