...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of comparative economics >Which sanctions matter? analysis of the EU/russian sanctions of 2014
【24h】

Which sanctions matter? analysis of the EU/russian sanctions of 2014

机译:哪些制裁? 2014年欧盟/俄罗斯制裁分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We use a quasi-natural experiment of reciprocal imposition of trade sanctions by Russia and the EU since 2014. Using UNCTAD/BACI bilateral flows data we take this unique opportunity to analyse both sanctions. In particular, we study the effectiveness of narrow versus broadly defined sanctions, and differences in the effectiveness of sanctions imposed on exports and imports. We show that the Russian sanctions imposed on European and American food imports resulted in about an 8 times stronger decline in trade flows than those imposed by the EU and the US on exports of extraction equipment. These results do not appear to be driven by diversion of trade flows via non-sanctioning countries. Hence the difference in sanctions' effectiveness can be attributed to the limited retroactivity of Western sanctions, which allowed exemptions for exports made pursuant to contracts made prior to 2014.
机译:我们使用俄罗斯及欧盟自然互动互惠互惠互惠互动实验,自2014年以来。使用贸发会议/ BACI双边流动数据,我们采取了这种独特的机会来分析制裁。 特别是,我们研究了狭隘与广泛定义的制裁的有效性,以及对出口和进口的制裁有效性的差异。 我们展示欧美粮食进口施加的俄罗斯制裁导致贸易流量下降大约8倍,而不是欧盟和美国对提取设备出口的贸易流量。 这些结果似乎无法通过非批准国家的贸易流量转移驱动。 因此,制裁效果的差异可归因于西方制裁的有限追溯性,这允许豁免根据2014年之前签订的合同所履行的出口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号