首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Communications >A Comparative Study on Improving Quality of Service in Networks Carrying Multi-Service Level Data over Resource-Limited Multi-Hop Wireless Networks
【24h】

A Comparative Study on Improving Quality of Service in Networks Carrying Multi-Service Level Data over Resource-Limited Multi-Hop Wireless Networks

机译:在资源受限的多跳无线网络上提高承载多服务水平数据的网络中服务质量的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Multi-hop Wireless Networks (MWNs) based on Single-Radio Single-Channel (SRSC) networks will likely attract more deployments if the required Quality of Service (QoS) can be provided. Carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) in MWNs faces an increase in packet loss and contention with an increase in the number of hops to reach the destination. This results in an increase in collisions and a wastage of bandwidth. The Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) treats all data the same, while the Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) method was mainly designed for delay-sensitive applications to provide multi-service differentiation. EDCA is known to provide unfairness, where higher-priority data can starve low-priority data under high loads. We have shown that Schedule-Before-Contention (SBC) packet scheduling strategies can address the limitation of EDCA, but it is still unclear which SBC strategy provides the best performance in distributed networks. Good scheduling mechanisms can reduce packet loss to the maximum, as well as avoid unnecessary delay. In this paper, we assert that the queue selection mechanism plays a critical role in the achievable Quality of Service (QoS). A comparative analysis of four SBC mechanisms is carried out and it is found that the transmission of lower-priority data helps lower packet loss, as this uses larger contention window ranges for back-off.
机译:如果可以提供所需的服务质量(QoS),则基于单无线电单通道(SRSC)网络的多跳无线网络(MWN)可能会吸引更多的部署。 MWN中带有冲突避免功能的载波侦听多路访问(CSMA / CA)面临着丢包和竞争的增加,而到达目的地的跳数也有所增加。这导致冲突的增加和带宽的浪费。分布式协调功能(DCF)将所有数据视为相同,而增强型分布式信道访问(EDCA)方法主要设计用于对延迟敏感的应用程序以提供多服务区分。众所周知,EDCA具有不公平性,在高负载情况下,较高优先级的数据可能会使低优先级的数据饿死。我们已经显示,竞争前调度(SBC)分组调度策略可以解决EDCA的局限性,但是仍不清楚哪种SBC策略在分布式网络中提供最佳性能。好的调度机制可以最大程度地减少丢包,并避免不必要的延迟。在本文中,我们断言队列选择机制在可实现的服务质量(QoS)中起着至关重要的作用。对四种SBC机制进行了比较分析,发现较低优先级数据的传输有助于降低数据包丢失,因为这使用较大的争用窗口范围进行退避。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号