首页> 外文期刊>Journal of communication >Police Detection of Deception: Beliefs About Behavioral Cues to Deception Are Strong Even Though Contextual Evidence Is More Useful
【24h】

Police Detection of Deception: Beliefs About Behavioral Cues to Deception Are Strong Even Though Contextual Evidence Is More Useful

机译:警方检测出欺骗行为:尽管上下文证据更有用,但有关欺骗行为的线索的信念仍然很强

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research questions the validity of behavioral deception cues; however, people believe behavioral cues are reliable deception indicators. Police officers and community members indicated both how lies can be detected (beliefs), and how they discovered a lie in the past (revealing information). Officers did the latter twice, prompted with a professional versus a personal context. For both groups, beliefs were primarily behavioral (e.g., demeanor) and revealing information contextual (evidence, third-party information, etc.). Officers responded similarly regardless of context. Relative to community members, officers provided more cues and referred more often to verbal contradictions and active detection strategies when asked about beliefs. Practitioners should be made aware of the discrepancies between their beliefs about deception cues and useful information to detect lies.
机译:研究质疑行为欺骗线索的有效性;但是,人们认为行为提示是可靠的欺骗指标。警务人员和社区成员都指出了如何发现谎言(信仰),以及过去如何发现谎言(公开信息)。军官做了两次,后者是在专业背景下还是个人背景下进行的。对于这两个群体而言,信念主要是行为上的(例如举止)和在上下文中揭示的信息(证据,第三方信息等)。无论情况如何,官员们的反应都是类似的。相对于社区成员,当问及信仰时,官员们提供了更多的线索,并更多地提到了言语矛盾和主动发现策略。应该使从业者意识到他们对欺骗线索的看法与检测谎言的有用信息之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号