...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Communication Management >Public relations and the free organizational publication: Practitioner perspectives on the brave new (media) world
【24h】

Public relations and the free organizational publication: Practitioner perspectives on the brave new (media) world

机译:公共关系和免费组织出版物:从业者对勇敢的新(媒体)世界的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss the results of research conducted among Scottish communication professionals, which investigated their perception of and attitudes toward recent trends and future developments with respect to the free organisational publication. Design/methodology/approach – The mainly qualitative data presented in this paper were gathered using an in-depth self-completion questionnaire. Findings – The paper finds that first, there have been significant changes in purpose, content, design and distribution of free organisational publications in recent years, but for the foreseeable future communication professionals envisage important roles for both print and electronic organisational publications. Second, practitioners tend to adopt the rhetoric and language of “technological determinism” when discussing new media technologies. That is, they tend to see themselves as relatively powerless in the face of “technological advances” and see their role as simply adopting what is given to them. This article argues that viewing the technology/society relationship from a more “social shaping” perspective will allow practitioners to utilise new media technologies in ways which will benefit them and their stakeholders. Research limitations/implications – The paper provides a more complete picture of the “value” of free organisational publications. Future research must necessarily investigate the viewpoint of the audiences. Practical implications – The paper draws lessons for practitioners on how best to employ print and electronic publications and how they should respond to current claims made about new media technologies. Originality/value – This paper investigates what is, in many ways, a quite different new media environment from that analysed by previously published UK research in this area. This study also theorises practitioner discourses in a more comprehensive way than many earlier studies by examining them in the context of the theoretical debates surrounding the relationship between technology and society.
机译:目的–本文的目的是介绍和讨论苏格兰传播专业人士之间进行的研究结果,该研究调查了他们对免费组织出版物方面的最新趋势和未来发展的看法和态度。设计/方法/方法–本文中介绍的主要定性数据是使用深入的自我完成调查表收集的。调查结果–该论文发现,首先,近年来,免费组织出版物的目的,内容,设计和发行已经发生了重大变化,但是对于可预见的未来传播专业人士而言,他们认为印​​刷和电子组织出版物都将发挥重要作用。其次,从业者在讨论新的媒体技术时倾向于采用“技术决定论”的措辞和措辞。也就是说,面对“技术进步”,他们倾向于认为自己相对无能为力,而将自己的角色看作只是采用给予他们的东西。本文认为,从更“社会塑造”的角度来看技术/社会关系将使从业人员能够以有益于他们及其利益相关者的方式利用新的媒体技术。研究的局限性/意义–该论文更全面地描述了免费组织出版物的“价值”。未来的研究必须调查受众的观点。实际意义–本文为从业人员提供了有关如何最好地利用印刷和电子出版物以及如何应对当前有关新媒体技术的主张的经验教训。原创性/价值–本文从许多方面调查了什么是与之前英国在该领域进行的研究所分析的完全不同的新媒体环境。与许多早期研究相比,本研究还通过围绕围绕技术与社会之间关系的理论辩论对实践者的话语进行了研究,从而对实践者话语进行了更全面的理论化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号