...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience >A Madness to the Methods in Cognitive Neuroscience?
【24h】

A Madness to the Methods in Cognitive Neuroscience?

机译:对认知神经科学方法的疯狂吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since Paul Broca, the relationship between mind and brain has been the central preoccupation of cognitive neuroscience. In the 19th century, recognition that mental faculties might be understood by observations of individuals with brain damage led to vigorous debates about the properties of mind. By the end of the First World War, neurologists had outlined basic frameworks for the neural organization of language, perception, and motor cognition. Geschwind revived these frameworks in the 1960s and by the 1980s, lesion studies had incorporated methods from experimental psychology, models from cognitive science, formalities from computational approaches, and early developments in structural brain imaging. Around the same time, functional neuroimaging entered the scene. Early xenon probes evolved to the present-day wonders of BOLD and per-fusion imaging. In a quick two decades, driven by these technical advances, centers for cognitive neuroscience now dot the landscape, journals such as this one are thriving, and the annual meeting of the Society for Cognitive Neuroscience is overflowing.
机译:自保罗·布罗卡(Paul Broca)以来,思想与大脑之间的关系一直是认知神经科学的中心课题。在19世纪,认识到对脑部损伤的个体进行观察可能会理解心理能力,这引发了关于心理属性的激烈争论。到第一次世界大战结束时,神经学家已经概述了语言,感知和运动认知的神经组织的基本框架。 Geschwind在1960年代复兴了这些框架,到1980年代,病灶研究已经纳入了实验心理学的方法,认知科学的模型,计算方法的形式以及结构性脑成像的早期发展。大约在同一时间,功能性神经影像学进入了现场。早期的氙气探针发展到如今的BOLD和灌注成像技术。在这些技术进步的推动下,短短的二十年间,认知神经科学的中心点点滴滴,诸如此类的期刊蓬勃发展,认知神经科学协会的年会也如雨后春笋般涌现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号