...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience >An Electrophysiological Dissociation between Orbitofrontal Reality Filtering and Context Source Monitoring
【24h】

An Electrophysiological Dissociation between Orbitofrontal Reality Filtering and Context Source Monitoring

机译:眶额现实过滤与上下文源监视之间的电生理分离

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Memory influences behavior in multiple ways. One important aspect is to remember in what precise context in the past a piece of information was acquired (context source monitoring). Another important aspect is to sense whether an upcoming thought, composed of fragments of memories, refers to present reality and can be acted upon (orbitofrontal reality filtering). Whether these memory control processes share common underlying mechanisms is unknown. Failures of both have been held accountable for false memories, including confabulation. Electrophysiological and imaging studies suggest a dissociation but used very different paradigms. In this study, we juxtaposed the requirements of context source monitoring and reality filtering within a unique continuous recognition task, which healthy participants performed while high-resolution evoked potentials were recorded. The mechanisms dissociated both behaviorally and electrophysiologically: Reality filtering induced a frontal positivity, absence of a specific electrocortical configuration, and posterior medial orbitofrontal activity at 200–300 msec. Context source monitoring had no electrophysiological expression in this early period. It was slower and less accurate than reality filtering and induced a prolonged positive potential over frontal leads starting at 400 msec. The study demonstrates a hitherto unrecognized separation between orbitofrontal reality filtering and source monitoring. Whereas deficient orbitofrontal reality filtering is associated with reality confusion in thinking, the behavioral correlates of deficient source monitoring should be verified with controlled experimental exploration.
机译:记忆以多种方式影响行为。一个重要方面是记住过去在什么精确上下文中获取了一条信息(上下文源监视)。另一个重要方面是感知由记忆碎片组成的即将发生的想法是否涉及当前现实并可以采取行动(眶额现实过滤)。这些内存控制过程是否共享共同的基础机制尚不清楚。两者的失败都被归咎于错误的记忆,包括虚假的记忆。电生理和影像学研究表明分离,但使用了非常不同的范例。在这项研究中,我们将上下文源监视和现实过滤的要求并列在一个独特的连续识别任务中,健康参与者在记录高分辨率诱发电位的同时执行了该任务。该机制在行为和电生理方面均不相关:在200-300毫秒时,现实过滤可引起额叶阳性,不存在特定的皮层构型以及后眼眶额叶活动。上下文源监视在此早期没有电生理表达。它比现实过滤速度慢且准确性不高,并且从400毫秒开始在额线上方产生了较长的正电位。这项研究表明,迄今尚未认识到眶额现实过滤与源监视之间的分离。尽管缺乏眼眶现实过滤与思维中的现实混乱相关联,但应通过受控的实验探索来验证缺乏源监控的行为相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号