首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Pathology >Pelvic lymph nodes: distribution and nodal tumour burden of urothelial bladder cancer
【24h】

Pelvic lymph nodes: distribution and nodal tumour burden of urothelial bladder cancer

机译:盆腔淋巴结:尿路上皮膀胱癌的分布和淋巴结转移

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aims To evaluate the number of lymph nodes and the lymph node tumour burden in different anatomical pelvic regions to better asses the impact of variations in the extent of lymphadenectomy on reported LN parameters and pelvic tumour clearance. Methods 162 patients with lymph-node-positive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were treated by cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Various lymph node parameters were determined separately for the three pelvic regions (external iliac, obturator and internal iliac).rnResults Of 4080 evaluated lymph nodes (median 25 per patient, range 8-55) 39%, 35% and 26% (p<0.05) were found in the external iliac, obturator and internal iliac region, respectively. The distribution of the 625 lymph node metastases (median two per patient, range 1-35) was not significantly different between the regions (external iliac 33%, obturator 38%, internal iliac 29%). However, the median diameter of largest metastasis and total diameter of all metastases were smallest in the internal iliac region (external iliac 0.85 cm, 1.1 cm; obturator 0.8 cm, 1.0 cm; internal iliac 0.6 cm, 0.8 cm; p<0.03, p<0.05; for median diameter of largest metastasis and total diameter of all metastases, respectively). Metastases in only one region were found in 33% of patients (external iliac 13%, obturator 10%, internal iliac 10%); these three groups showed no significant difference in survival. No difference was detected in lymph node parameters between genders. Conclusions Lymph node counts and retrieval of metastases depends on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy. Dissection not including the internal iliac region misses 26% of all pelvic lymph nodes, 29% of metastases, and understages a substantial number of patients as pNO (10%).
机译:目的评估淋巴结在不同解剖盆腔区域的数目和淋巴结肿瘤负荷,以更好地评估淋巴结清扫术范围变化对所报告的LN参数和盆腔肿瘤清除率的影响。方法对162例膀胱淋巴结阳性的尿路上皮癌患者行膀胱切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术。分别确定了三个骨盆区域(ternal外,闭孔和internal内)的各种淋巴结参数。结果4080个评估淋巴结(每位患者中位25个,范围8-55)为39%,35%和26%(p < 0.05)分别在in外,闭孔和internal内区域发现。 625个淋巴结转移的分布(每名患者中位数两个,范围1-35)在两个区域之间没有显着差异(ternal外33%,闭孔38%,internal内29%)。然而,最大的转移的中位直径和所有转移的总直径在内区域最小((外0.85 cm,1.1 cm;闭孔0.8 cm,1.0 cm; internal内0.6 cm,0.8 cm; p <0.03,p <0.05;最大转移的中位直径和所有转移的总直径分别为<0.05。 33%的患者仅在一个区域发现转移(外13%,闭孔10%,internal内10%);这三组的生存率无明显差异。男女之间的淋巴结参数没有发现差异。结论淋巴结计数和转移的恢复取决于盆腔淋巴结清扫术的程度。不包括内区域的清扫术错过了所有盆腔淋巴结的26%,转移的29%,并且将相当多的患者分期为pNO(10%)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Clinical Pathology》 |2010年第6期|P.504-507|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Pathology, University of Bern, Switzerland;

    rnDepartment of Pathology, University of Bern, Switzerland;

    rnDepartment of Urology, University of Bern, Switzerland;

    rnDepartment of Pathology, University of Bern, Switzerland Department of Pathology, Murtenstrasse, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:36:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号