首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >CSR investment decision and coordination strategy for closed-loop supply chain with two competing retailers
【24h】

CSR investment decision and coordination strategy for closed-loop supply chain with two competing retailers

机译:CSR投资决策与两个竞争零售商闭环供应链的协调策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Due to the influence of external factors such as government regulations, public concern and media reports, some enterprises will show their contribution to the society and environment by performing corporate social responsibility (CSR) so as to establish a good corporate image and enhance market competitiveness. According to this, we believe that it is of theoretical and practical significance to explore the recovery and pricing decision of closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) with CSR investment. This paper investigates the decision and coordination problems for a CLSC considering CSR investment with two competing retailers. Based on three modes: 1) without CSR investment, 2) only one retailer considers CSR investment, 3) both the two competing retailers consider CSR investment, the pricing decision models of CLSC under centralized and decentralized decision-making are constructed respectively. The research shows that the retailers with CSR investment behaviour gain more profits than that without CSR investment. From the perspective of improving the overall performance of CLSC, the operation mode with both two competing retailers consider CSR investment is the best, while the operation mode that without CSR investment is the worst. For the decentralized CLSC with two competing retailers considering CSR investment simultaneously, a coordination mechanism based on "revenue-cost sharing" is established, which can effectively realize the coordination of CLSC system within the scope of contract parameters that all member enterprises are willing to accept.
机译:由于外部因素如政府法规,公众关注和媒体报道,一些企业将通过表演企业社会责任(CSR)向社会和环境表示贡献,以便建立一个良好的企业形象,提升市场竞争力。据此,我们认为,探讨闭环供应链(CLSC)与企业社会责任投资的恢复和定价决策是理论和实践意义。本文调查CLSC的决定和协调问题,以考虑两位竞争零售商的CSR投资。基于三种模式:1)未经CSR投资,2)只有一个零售商考虑CSR投资,3)两位竞争零售商都考虑CSR投资,分别建造了CLSC的CLSC定价模型,分别构建了CLSC。该研究表明,具有CSR投资行为的零售商比没有CSR投资的影响更多的利润。从改善CLSC的整体性能的角度来看,两个竞争零售商的操作模式考虑CSR投资是最好的,而没有CSR投资的操作模式是最糟糕的。对于分散的CLSC,两个竞争零售商同时考虑CSR投资,建立了一个基于“收入成本分担”的协调机制,可以有效地实现了CLSC系统在所有成员企业愿意接受的合同参数范围内的协调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号