首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Comparative analysis of biorefinery designs based on acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation under exergetic, techno-economic, and sensitivity analyses towards a sustainability perspective
【24h】

Comparative analysis of biorefinery designs based on acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation under exergetic, techno-economic, and sensitivity analyses towards a sustainability perspective

机译:基于丙酮 - 丁醇 - 乙醇发酵的生物遗产设计对可持续性视角下的丙酮 - 丁醇 - 乙醇发酵的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Chemical process sustainability has been gaining attention as a comprehensive framework for diagnosing, optimizing, and improving a chemical design. This work presents a comprehensive assessment involving techno-economic, sensitivity, and exergetic factors of two biorefinery configurations for butanol production. The methodology presented here comprises three main steps for assessing biorefinery designs under a mixed techno-economic and exergetic assessment. Firstly, feedstock and processing units were selected based on the defined task (butanol production from lignocellulosic biomass). A general Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol (ABE) fermentation biorefinery was established considering (i) Pretreatment, (ii) Enzymatic hydrolysis, (iii) Fermentation, and (iv) Separation stages. The second step was the process modeling stages, in which biorefineries were simulated using Aspen Plus software, generating several quantitative data to perform economic and exergetic analyses. The last stage of the method is associated with the chemical process sustainability assessment based on techno-economic, sensitivity, and exergy analyses. Biobutanol topology 1 presented a production capacity of 32,737,45 kg/h butanol, while topology 2 generated 37,480 kg/h of this product. Both biorefinery designs had a biomass feed flow of 320,829 kg/h. The results revealed that both topologies were worthy alternatives from an economic viewpoint, considering the Net Present Value (NPV) 908.74 MM USD for topology 1, and 879.03 MM USD for topology 2. The Return on Investment (ROI) was 29.11% for topology 1 and 37.76% for topology 2. Regarding exergetic analysis, biobutanol topology 1 showed an exergy efficiency of 26.03%. In comparison, topology 2 gives an efficiency of 39.89%. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:化学工艺可持续性一直是诊断,优化和改善化学设计的综合框架。这项工作提出了综合评估,涉及用于丁醇生产两种生物遗产配置的技术经济,敏感性和突出因子。本文呈现的方法包括三个主要步骤,用于评估混合技术经济和前进评估下的生物遗产设计。首先,基于定义的任务(来自木质纤维素生物量的丁醇生产)选择原料和处理单元。考虑(i)预处理,(ii)酶水解,(III)发酵和(IV)分离阶段,建立了一般丙酮丁醇 - 乙醇(ABE)发酵生物颗粒。第二步是过程建模阶段,其中使用Aspen Plus软件模拟生物寄​​生体,产生若干定量数据,以进行经济和前进分析。该方法的最后阶段与基于技术经济,敏感性和出境分析的化学过程可持续性评估相关。 Biobutanol拓扑1呈现了32,737,45 kg / h丁醇的生产能力,而拓扑2产生了本产品的37,480kg / h。 BioRefinery设计的生物质进料流量为320,829 kg / h。结果表明,两种拓扑都是经济观点的有价值的替代品,考虑到拓扑1,879.03毫米美元的拓扑表2.拓扑2.投资回报(ROI)为29.11%的拓扑1拓扑结构27.76%2.关于前进分析,Biobutanol拓扑1显示出效率为26.03%。相比之下,拓扑2给出了39.89%的效率。 (c)2021 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号