首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: a review and conceptual comparison of market- and stakeholder-oriented strategies
【24h】

Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: a review and conceptual comparison of market- and stakeholder-oriented strategies

机译:企业对可持续发展的责任:以市场和利益相关者为导向的战略的回顾和概念比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reviews and compares two mainstream business theories, namely market and stakeholder orientations, as contending strategies of corporate responsibility for sustainable development. We argue that even though stakeholder orientation offers a broader inclusion of values and expectations than market orientation, they share considerable similarities in terms of sustainability assumptions and how the role of the corporation becomes perceived in the quest for sustainable development. Both strategies leave responsibility outside the firm by emphasising the role of either customers or stakeholders as the basis of strategizing. Both strategies are also based on assumptions consistent with weak sustainability (at best), which is argued to be insufficient in order to achieve sustainability over time and space. Therefore, this article suggests that a new orientation is needed if corporations are to contribute to sustainable development, namely sustainable development orientation. We call for further research in outlining a business strategy that admits corporations' responsibility for sustainable development and departs from the strong sustainability assumption.
机译:本文回顾并比较了两种主流商业理论,即市场和利益相关者取向,以此作为企业可持续发展责任制的竞争策略。我们认为,尽管利益相关者导向提供的价值和期望要比市场导向更为广泛,但是他们在可持续性假设以及在寻求可持续发展方面如何看待公司的作用方面有着相似的相似之处。两种策略都通过强调客户或利益相关者作为战略基础的角色而将责任留在公司之外。两种策略均基于与弱的可持续性(至多)相一致的假设,据认为这不足以在时间和空间上实现可持续性。因此,本文建议,如果公司要为可持续发展做出贡献,就需要一个新的方向,即可持续发展方向。我们呼吁进行进一步的研究,以概述一种商业战略,该战略承认企业对可持续发展的责任,并且背离了强有力的可持续性假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号