首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Economic input-output life cycle assessment of concrete pavement containing recycled concrete aggregate
【24h】

Economic input-output life cycle assessment of concrete pavement containing recycled concrete aggregate

机译:经济投入输出含有再生混凝土骨料混凝土路面的生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Concrete pavement recycling has become a common practice for many states in the U.S. While material properties and structural performance of pavements with virgin concrete aggregates replaced by recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) have been extensively characterized, very little effort has been made to assess potential sustainability benefits of this application. A life cycle assessment to compare an RCA based portland cement concrete (RCA-PCC) pavement and a plain PCC pavement (i.e., without RCA) from all three aspects of sustainability (i.e., economic impact, social impact, and environmental impact) was carried out using an economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) approach. An inventory of stressors during materials production and construction, use, and end-of-life phases of pavement life cycle was obtained, followed by a life cycle impact analysis using the Tool for Reduction and Assessment of Chemicals and other Environmental Impacts (TRACI). Based on the results, the benefits of using RCA during the materials production and construction phase are invariably achieved for all the sustainability categories, but the RCA-PCC pavement would pose higher negative impacts during the use phase of pavement life. Still, the pavement made with RCA-PCC was found to be generally more environmentally and socially friendly compared to the pavement made with virgin aggregates, especially for the TRACI categories of ecotoxicity, human health cancer, and human health non-cancer. The sustainability benefits of using RCA for concrete pavement application will only be magnified with a growing level of environmental awareness, further diminishment of local virgin aggregate sources, and a rapid increase of landfill tipping costs for construction demolition debris in the future. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:混凝土路面回收已成为美国许多州的常见做法,虽然具有被循环混凝土聚集体(RCA)所取代的维珍混凝土聚集体的材料性能和结构性能,但已经广泛表现,已经努力评估潜在的可持续性益处这个申请。从所有三个方面进行比较基于RCA的波特兰水泥混凝土(RCA-PCC)路面和普通PCC路面(即,没有RCA)的生命周期评估(即经济影响,社会影响和环境影响)使用经济投入输出生命周期评估(EIO-LCA)方法。获得材料生产和施工,使用和路面寿命周期的寿命和寿命阶段的压力源库存,然后使用该工具进行生命周期的影响分析,用于减少和评估化学品和其他环境影响(Traci)。基于结果,对于所有可持续性类别,材料生产和施工阶段在材料生产和施工阶段中使用RCA的益处,但RCA-PCC路面将在路面寿命的使用阶段造成更高的负面影响。尽管如此,与用原始聚集体制造的路面相比,用RCA-PCC制造的路面通常是更环保和社会友好的,特别是对于生态毒性,人类健康癌症和人类健康非癌症的TRACI类别。利用RCA进行混凝土路面应用的可持续性益处只会以日益增长的环境意识,进一步减少当前的处女汇总来源,以及未来建设拆迁碎片的垃圾填埋填充成本的快速增长。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号