首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >A comparative life cycle assessment of luminaires for general lighting for the office - compact fluorescent (CFL) vs Light Emitting Diode (LED) - a case study
【24h】

A comparative life cycle assessment of luminaires for general lighting for the office - compact fluorescent (CFL) vs Light Emitting Diode (LED) - a case study

机译:办公室普通照明灯具的寿命周期比较评估-紧凑型荧光灯(CFL)与发光二极管(LED)-案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The paper presents a life cycle assessment of two lighting technologies based on compact fluorescent (CFL) and Light Emitting Diode (LED) luminaires for the general lighting of the office. The life cycle assessments are carried out considering all the parts of the luminaire: lamp, housing and ballast (or driver for LED). The environmental impact is evaluated considering the whole life cycle of the devices, from manufacturing (including the extraction of raw materials), to use and disposal. An experimental test was conducted to verify the illuminance produced by the two systems. Alternative end-of-life and electricity production scenarios were assessed and compared in order to evaluate possible variations deriving from these changes. The life cycle assessments show that the LED luminaire allows the environmental impacts to be significantly reduced (reduction of 41-50% of greenhouse gas emission and cumulative energy demand), mainly due to high energy efficiency in the use stage. The present paper makes three original contributions: 1) it presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a last generation kind of LED and luminaire built for this technology and compares it with a similar CFL luminaire; 2) it presents one of the first LCAs for lighting luminaires made with International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) 2011 Midpoint; 3) it shows a comparison evaluated with two functional units: 1 lm per 50,000 h and 1 lux per 50,000 h.
机译:本文介绍了基于紧凑型荧光灯(CFL)和发光二极管(LED)照明器的两种照明技术的生命周期评估,用于办公室的一般照明。进行生命周期评估时要考虑照明器的所有部分:灯,外壳和镇流器(或LED驱动器)。考虑到设备的整个生命周期,从制造(包括提取原材料)到使用和处置,对环境影响进行评估。进行了实验测试以验证两个系统产生的照度。对替代的报废和电力生产情景进行了评估和比较,以评估由这些变化产生的可能变化。生命周期评估表明,LED照明设备可以显着减少对环境的影响(减少41%至50%的温室气体排放和累积的能源需求),这主要是由于使用阶段的高能效所致。本文做出了三点原创性贡献:1)提出了针对该技术构建的上一代LED和灯具的生命周期评估(LCA),并将其与类似的CFL灯具进行了比较; 2)它是采用国际参考生命周期数据系统(ILCD)2011 Midpoint制造的首批照明灯具LCA之一; 3)它显示了使用两个功能单元评估的比较:每50,000小时1 lm和每50,000 h 1 lux。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2014年第15期|96-107|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 1, Ancona, Italy;

    Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 1, Ancona, Italy;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Life cycle assessment; LED; CFL; Luminaires; Lighting; ILCD 2011;

    机译:生命周期评估;发光二极管;节能灯;灯具;灯光;液晶显示器2011;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号