首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Land use and land use change in agricultural life cycle assessments and carbon footprints - the case for regionally specific land use change versus other methods
【24h】

Land use and land use change in agricultural life cycle assessments and carbon footprints - the case for regionally specific land use change versus other methods

机译:农业生命周期评估和碳足迹中的土地利用和土地利用变化-区域特定土地利用变化与其他方法的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The supply chain of a product is essential for understanding its environmental impacts. As parts of agricultural product supply chains, land use (LU) and land use change (LUC) are considered to be major contributors to global CO_2 emissions. Nevertheless, LU and LUC (LULUC) are rarely included in GHG estimations for food and feedstuffs. Here we propose a method which can be used to derive emissions from LU and LUC on a regional level. Emissions are distributed over an accounting period chosen to match the physically occurring carbon fluxes. As fluxes from soil organic carbon persist for years or even for decades after a LUC episode, depending on the climatic conditions of the region, we apply 10 and 20 years as suitable accounting periods for tropical and temperate climate zones, respectively. We compare the proposed method with two other methods proposed in the literature. Using two types of feedstuffs (Brazilian soybean-meal and Austrian barley) as examples, we find that the other two methods produce mostly lower emission estimates in the case of Brazilian soybeans, and higher estimates for Austrian barley. We conclude that these differences are caused mainly by different accounting periods and by a (non)consideration of regional specificities. While analysing life cycles necessarily entails a well supported - but still arbitrary - setting of such system boundaries, we argue that the methodology presented here better reflects actually occurring carbon fluxes that we understand to be the foundation of any environmental product assessment.
机译:产品的供应链对于了解其环境影响至关重要。作为农产品供应链的一部分,土地利用(LU)和土地利用变化(LUC)被认为是全球CO_2排放的主要贡献者。但是,LU和LUC(LULUC)很少包含在食品和饲料的温室气体估算中。在这里,我们提出了一种可用于从区域水平上的LU和LUC得出排放量的方法。排放在选定的会计期间内进行分配,以匹配物理发生的碳通量。在LUC发作后,由于土壤有机碳的通量持续存在数年甚至数十年,这取决于该地区的气候条件,因此我们分别将10年和20年作为热带和温带气候区的合适会计期。我们将提出的方法与文献中提出的其他两种方法进行比较。以两种饲料(巴西大豆粉和奥地利大麦)为例,我们发现,对于巴西大豆,其他两种方法产生的排放量估计较低,而奥地利大麦的估计值较高。我们得出的结论是,这些差异主要是由于不同的会计期间以及对(地区)特殊性的考虑。虽然分析生命周期必然需要对此类系统边界进行很好的支持(但仍然是任意的)设置,但我们认为此处介绍的方法更好地反映了实际发生的碳通量,我们认为这是任何环境产品评估的基础。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2014年第15期|31-39|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) Austria, Doblhoffgasse 7/10, A-1010 Vienna, Austria,BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Division of Livestock Sciences, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria;

    BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Division of Livestock Sciences, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria;

    BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Division of Livestock Sciences, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria;

    Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) Austria, Doblhoffgasse 7/10, A-1010 Vienna, Austria,BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Centre for Global Change and Sustainability, Borkowskigasse 4, A-1190 Vienna, Austria;

    University of Graz, Institute of Systems Sciences, Innovation and Sustainability Research, Merangasse 18/1, A-8010 Graz, Austria,International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Land use; Land use change; Agriculture; Greenhouse gas emissions; GHG; Feedstuffs;

    机译:土地利用;土地用途变化;农业;温室气体排放;温室气体饲料原料;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号