...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions - management options and abatement cost
【24h】

Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions - management options and abatement cost

机译:水泥行业的温室气体排放-管理方案和减排成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Growing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and increasing global demand for cement are general drivers for managing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in the cement industry. Overall CO2 dominates cement sector GHG emissions. The aim was to study how the management of GHG emissions in the cement production chain is related to (1) clinker substitutes, (2) primary source of energy, (3) electricity emissions, (4) technology in use and (5) geographic location. Therefore regional CO2 emissions in the cement industry were analyzed by applying a climate impact management matrix on a cradle-to-gate basis. The use of clinker substitutes in cement varied from 3% to 36.4%. The results show that the variation of process technology and thermal energy use related CO2 emissions is more significant than that of electricity emissions. The highest near term potential to avoid emissions is replacing clinker with mineral components (MIC). Increasing the global use of MIC to a level of 34.2%in cement would save 312 Mt CO2 with the 2013 level of annual cement production. Similarly, a 2.7% reduction in thermal energy use would save 28 Mt CO2 annually, and a 10% decrease of emissions from electricity use would save 26 Mt CO2. The best long term options from 2030 onwards are different carbon capture technologies and MgO and geopolymer cements. In addition, the CO2 abatement costs of different investment projects were compared by using a uniform capital recovery factor. The abatement cost of avoided emissions varied from US$4 to US$ 448 per ton of CO2 depending on the technology, geographical location and initial level of CO2 emissions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:人为温室气体排放量的增长以及全球对水泥的需求不断增长,这是管理水泥行业温室气体排放量(GHG)的主要动力。总体二氧化碳占水泥行业温室气体排放的主导。目的是研究水泥生产链中温室气体排放的管理与(1)熟料替代品,(2)主要能源,(3)电力排放,(4)使用的技术和(5)地理环境之间的关系。位置。因此,通过应用从摇篮到大门的气候影响管理矩阵,对水泥行业的区域CO2排放进行了分析。水泥中熟料替代品的使用范围从3%到36.4%。结果表明,工艺技术和热能利用相关的二氧化碳排放量的变化比电力排放量更显着。避免排放的近期最高潜力是用矿物质成分(MIC)代替熟料。与2013年水泥年产量水平相比,将MIC在全球水泥中的使用量提高到34.2%的水平将节省312 Mt的二氧化碳。同样,热能使用量减少2.7%每年将节省28 Mt CO2,电力使用量减少10%可以节省26 Mt CO2。从2030年开始,最好的长期选择是使用不同的碳捕获技术以及MgO和地质聚合物水泥。此外,还使用统一的资本回收率比较了不同投资项目的二氧化碳减排成本。避免排放的减排成本从每吨二氧化碳4美元到448美元不等,具体取决于技术,地理位置和二氧化碳初始排放水平。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号