首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry
【24h】

Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry

机译:循环经济转型中的制度激励:荷兰纺织工业中的材料使用案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this paper is to gain insight into how requirements for transitioning to circular economy creates new organizational forms in inter-firm collaborations, and ultimately how they stimulate the emergence of new institutions enhancing sustainability. Two strands of literature, one on circular economy and one on institutional analysis, provide the theoretical background for this research. Currently a clearly formulated and unified theory on the institutions of circular economy is lacking. Therefore this research compares and contrasts empirical evidence from cases derived from the textile industry in The Netherlands, and concepts derived from institutional analysis and literature on circular economy to inductively build a cohesive conceptual framework. Using information from cases we identified two pathways to transition into circular economy and to manage circular material flows. We define these pathways Status Quo arrangements (SQ), when firms focus on optimizing up-cycling technologies and infrastructure in their circular relations and collaborations, and Product as Service arrangements (PAS), to indicate a focus on providing products in service contracts. Chain coordination, contracting, and financial mechanisms were identified as key organizational elements for creating new pathways to transition into circular materials flows. However in analyzing these elements we also highlight differences between SQ and PAS arrangements. SQ arrangements may have implications at the level of formal rules, for example by creating a new industry standards for up-cycled fabrics. PAS arrangements may have wider implications, for example by reshaping ownership in service contracts and creating cascading activities. Moving ownership to the supply chain will result in increased responsibility for materials and will create an incentive for improving quality of products, including their environmental performance. This is expected to generate positive socio-environmental impacts at a system level as well. Moreover PAS arrangements may have bottom up effects at a formal institutional level, resulting in alteration and creation of formal rules, for example in terms of new approaches to the ownership of materials. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文的目的是深入了解过渡到循环经济的要求如何在企业间协作中创建新的组织形式,以及最终它们如何刺激新机构的出现,从而增强可持续性。两篇文献,一本关于循环经济,一本关于制度分析,为这项研究提供了理论背景。目前,缺乏关于循环经济制度的明确表述和统一的理论。因此,本研究比较和对比了来自荷兰纺织业案例的经验证据,以及来自制度分析和循环经济文献的概念,以归纳地建立了一个有凝聚力的概念框架。利用案例中的信息,我们确定了过渡到循环经济和管理循环物质流的两种途径。当企业侧重于优化其循环关系和合作中的上升级技术和基础架构以及产品即服务安排(PAS)时,我们定义了这些状态现状安排(SQ),以表明侧重于在服务合同中提供产品。链协调,合同和财务机制被确定为创建过渡到循环物料流的新途径的关键组织要素。但是,在分析这些元素时,我们还强调了SQ和PAS安排之间的差异。 SQ安排可能会对正式规则产生影响,例如,通过为上层循环面料创建新的行业标准。 PAS安排可能具有更广泛的含义,例如,通过重塑服务合同的所有权并创建级联活动。将所有权转移到供应链将导致对材料的责任增加,并将激励人们提高产品质量,包括其环境绩效。预计这也会在系统级别产生积极的社会环境影响。此外,考绩制度的安排可能会在正式机构一级产生自下而上的影响,从而导致变更和创建正式规则,例如,在采用新的材料所有权方法方面。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2017年第2期|17-32|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Wageningen Univ, Management Studies Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands;

    Wageningen Univ, Management Studies Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands|Univ Exeter, Business Sch, Sustainabil & Circular Econ, Exeter, Devon, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号