...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Environmental assessment of a bi-fuel thermal power plant in an isolated power system in the Brazilian Amazon region
【24h】

Environmental assessment of a bi-fuel thermal power plant in an isolated power system in the Brazilian Amazon region

机译:巴西亚马逊地区隔离电力系统中的双燃料火力发电厂的环境评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study presents an environmental assessment of a bi-fuel Thermal Power Plant (TPP) in the Brazilian Amazon Region. The TPP was originally designed to use Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), but with the Natural Gas (NG) extraction in the Amazon basin, the TPP was modified to use NG and HFO concomitantly. In order to observe the differences, a comparative study of this power plant was performed in two situations: using only heavy fuel oil and using HFO and NG concomitantly. The life cycle assessment methodology was conducted from "cradle-to-gate". The CML baseline method was used to assess the midpoint impacts. Primary data were collected by personal visits for environmental emissions, wastewater, fuel used, and technical specifications. Eleven impact categories were considered and Monte Carlo (MC) Analysis was used to assess and to obtain robust results. The study shows that upstream processes have more impacts except global warming potential, eutrophication, acidification, human toxicity and photochemical oxidation where TPP showed the main contribution. The bi-fuel conversion resulted in lower power plant participations in the impacts as, for example, a reduction of 61.1% in Eutrophication Potential. In addition, throughout the life cycle the bi-fuel power plant, when the operation is compared with HFO only, has six potential impacts lower. Furthermore, this study showed that bi-fuel operation has lower local and regional impact, and according to the MC analysis, statistically, bi-fuel operation does not contribute to exacerbate global trends in GHG emissions when compared with monofuel operation. It is an interesting observation that global warming results by MC analysis showed that there are no statistical differences between the two modes of operation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究提出了对巴西亚马逊地区双燃料热电厂(TPP)的环境评估。 TPP最初设计为使用重燃料油(HFO),但是在亚马逊盆地提取天然气(NG)后,TPP进行了修改,以同时使用NG和HFO。为了观察差异,在两种情况下对该电厂进行了比较研究:仅使用重质燃料油,并同时使用HFO和NG。生命周期评估方法是从“从摇篮到大门”进行的。 CML基线方法用于评估中点影响。通过个人访问收集了有关环境排放,废水,所用燃料和技术规格的主要数据。考虑了11种影响类别,并使用蒙特卡洛(MC)分析来评估并获得可靠的结果。研究表明,除了全球变暖潜能,富营养化,酸化,人类毒性和光化学氧化以外,上游过程的影响更大,而TPP发挥了主要作用。双燃料转换导致电厂参与的影响降低,例如富营养化潜力降低了61.1%。此外,在整个生命周期中,与仅将HFO进行比较时,双燃料发电厂的潜在影响降低了六倍。此外,这项研究表明,双燃料运行对本地和区域的影响较小,而且根据MC分析,与单燃料运行相比,双燃料运行不会加剧全球温室气体排放趋势。有趣的观察是,通过MC分析得出的全球变暖结果表明,两种操作模式之间没有统计学差异。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号